Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsSymbols
(Page 2 of 2)

Redesign of Pepsi logo hard to swallow

The new look raises a question: What were they thinking?

March 03, 2009|DAN NEIL

"I still don't think I understand the justification for the different smiles," Montgomery says. "I don't know that is something that is even understandable. . . . It does make the design business look a little bit ridiculous and expensive."

Succinctly, then, Arnell Group has outsmarted itself, plumbing the depths of Western genius to come up with a Big Idea that is ultimately very dumb. Why? Think about it. What is the operative metaphor of Pepsi? Pepsi is that which Coca-Cola is not. Coke is majestically, eternally red; therefore Pepsi has been obliged, over the decades, to acquire an ever-deeper shade of blue. Coke's is a brand mark out of time, a living Smithsonian exhibit. Pepsi is required to be perpetually young, generational and ephemeral (this is actually the fourth logo design for Pepsi since 1991).

Clearly, Arnell Group felt compelled to eliminate the last vestige of similarity between the brand marks: the sinuous waveform that traverses the old Pepsi logo and beats across Coca-Cola's script logo -- a similarity that dates all the way back to old Bradham.

And the logo isn't even very pretty. So why is this brand smiling?

--

Dan Neil will appear in Tuesday's Company Town, writing on advertising and marketing. He can be reached at dan.neil@latimes.com.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|