SACRAMENTO — Staff shortages are forcing tens of thousands of state workers employed at prisons and other around-the-clock institutions to report to work on their furlough days -- and the state is paying them with what amount to IOUs that will be costly to taxpayers, according to a Senate report to be released today.
In the long run, the state will save far less than the $1.7-billion touted by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger when he ordered state workers furloughed three days a month, the report concludes.
"Really what is happening in these facilities is the state is not reducing hours, they're just deferring paychecks," said Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), who ordered the report.
"Plain and simple, it's a poorly thought-out program."
In the case of the prison healthcare system, the furloughs are actually costing the state tens of millions of dollars, the report states.
Clark Kelso, the federally appointed prisons medical receiver, had asked the Schwarzenegger administration for a furlough waiver but was denied.
"We're able to cover what otherwise would be the gap in personnel by using overtime" and private nurses and doctors, Kelso said. The entire $108 million in projected furlough savings has been wiped out, according to the report.
The regular prison health-system workers, meanwhile, are accruing vacation and furlough time that will cost the state $37 million to $47 million in coming years, the report states.
"We're creating a long-term liability for the state, and it's hurting people," said Steinberg, who represents the capital city, the hub of a state workforce enduring a 14% pay cut. The Democratic leader created the Senate committee that wrote the report.
Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Rachel Cameron said the administration would review the findings of the report, which was obtained by The Times.
Despite earlier criticism of furloughs, particularly for workers paid with federal money and tax collectors whose forced days off cost California money, the governor has steadfastly defended his across-the-board approach.
"The state has never had to deal with a $60-billion deficit -- over half of the general fund -- in one year," Cameron said. "Because of that, all areas of state government have been forced to cut back and do more with less."
