WASHINGTON — Maneuvering to improve prospects for sweeping healthcare legislation, Senate Democrats hope first to win quick approval for a bill that grants doctors a $247-billion increase in Medicare fees over a decade but raises federal deficits in the process, officials said Wednesday.
By creating a two-bill approach, Democrats can contend that the more comprehensive healthcare measure meets President Obama's conditions -- that it will neither add to deficits nor exceed $900 billion in costs over 10 years.
If approved and signed into law, the legislation would avert a 21% reduction in Medicare fees paid to doctors, which is scheduled to take effect in January, as well as additional cuts in future years.
Lawmakers frequently draft budgets that assume payment rates for doctors treating Medicare patients will fall rather than rise, part of a sleight of hand set of assumptions to make deficits appear smaller than they actually are. They then convene the following year and restore the money.
The disclosure of Senate Democrats' plans came as senior lawmakers sat down with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and other top administration officials for the first time to draft a healthcare bill expected to be voted on in the full Senate beginning in about two weeks.
Two Senate committees have approved different versions of the legislation, requiring the unusual set of negotiations.
The bill to restore planned Medicare cuts for doctors was introduced without fanfare in the Senate on Tuesday and set aside for swift floor action next week, rather than be sent to the Senate Finance Committee for hearings, as would normally be the case.
"This is a bill that would permanently change the payment system for physicians to a fairer system," Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said as she introduced the bill.
Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), said the decision to move quickly and apart from the healthcare bill was made in consultation with the White House. House Democratic leaders were also involved in the discussions.
House Democrats have grumbled about trying to adhere to Obama's price tag.
In the Senate, the immediate effect of a two-bill approach is to slice $10.7 billion from the cost of the healthcare bill that cleared the finance committee, money that could then be spent on other priorities.
A 60-vote Senate majority will be required to pass the measure, potentially placing Republican senators in a quandary.
If they oppose it, they may anger doctors who have made restoration of the planned payment cuts a priority.
If they support it, they may open themselves up to charges they helped raise deficits and facilitated passage of a healthcare bill that conservatives oppose.