Advertisement
 

Lockyer says no irregularities found so far in probe of banks' swaps trading on California muni bonds

State treasurer says data and answers supplied by six big banks show no sign that they bet against the credit quality of state general obligation bonds.

April 23, 2010|By Tom Petruno, Los Angeles Times
  • State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, left, confers in February with Deputy Treasurer Katie Carroll at the state Capitol.
State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, left, confers in February with Deputy Treasurer… (Ken James / Bloomberg )

A lot of big numbers — but no smoking gun.

That's what California Treasurer Bill Lockyer says he has found, so far, in probing major Wall Street banks' trading in so-called credit default swaps on the state's municipal bonds.

Lockyer last month sent letters to six banking giants, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., questioning whether their activities in the swaps market might be driving up interest rates on the state's debt — even as the banks earn lucrative fees from underwriting new state bond offerings.

Credit default swap contracts are a way for investors and traders to buy insurance against a default by a bond issuer. The cost of that insurance on California's general obligation bonds had surged early this year, which indicated one of two things, or both: Some owners of the state's debt were growing more fearful of a default, or speculators were pushing up swap insurance prices and thereby fomenting worries about the state — which, in turn, could make the insurance more valuable.

Higher swap-insurance costs also could have the effect of forcing the cash-strapped state to pay higher interest rates to borrow than it otherwise would. That concern has irked Lockyer, who has insisted throughout the state's budget travails that California would never default on its bond debt.

In a report Thursday, Lockyer said the six banks — all of which are major underwriters of the state's bond offerings — have traded more than $27.5 billion of credit default swaps on California debt since 2007. That figure covers buying and selling of swaps by the banks both for themselves and for their investor and trader clients, including hedge funds. The swaps could have been written against any of the state's outstanding general obligation bonds, which now total $69 billion.

But beyond the big headline number, Lockyer said the data and answers the banks supplied to his inquiry about their swaps activity "suggest the banks themselves, during the period covered, did not bet against the credit quality of California general obligation bonds."

As for the question of the swaps market's effect on the state's interest costs, Lockyer's report said it found that any effect "is not significant enough to cause concern at this time," although the report underlined "at this time."

In what could be a landmark legal case, the Securities and Exchange Commission last week charged Goldman Sachs with fraud in connection with a subprime-mortgage-related investment the bank sold in 2007. The SEC alleges that Goldman failed to disclose that it allowed hedge fund manager John Paulson to help pick securities for the investment, knowing that Paulson also planned to bet against the securities via credit default swaps.

Lockyer on Thursday didn't resist the urge to take a shot at the banks. Besides Goldman and JPMorgan, his inquiry covered Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch unit, Barclays, Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley.

"These banks told us that the credit default swaps market can bring some benefit to California because it increases liquidity and makes our bonds more attractive to investors" by allowing them to hedge against risk, the treasurer said in a statement. "That may, or may not, be true.... Taxpayers' primary operating principle should be this: Look out when Wall Street says it's looking out for you."

Christopher Whalen, a principal at market research firm Institutional Risk Analytics in New York, said he believed that most of the banks' trading in swaps on California debt was purely speculative. Most bond owners, he said, don't use swaps to hedge. "If you're worried about credit risk, you sell the bond," he said.

Lockyer said he wanted more data on the role of speculators who use swaps to bet against California's debt.

"More information is needed to determine the extent to which the banks' clients who have no California credit exposure have placed speculative bets with California credit default swaps, and the extent to which the banks have facilitated those bets," the treasurer's report said.

It said the state would ask the banks for that information — and would require all 86 banks that regularly underwrite the state's bond sales to report to Lockyer quarterly on their swaps activities.

tom.petruno@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|