Advertisement
 
(Page 2 of 2)

Brewing legal disputes could define Kagan's early tenure

Coming soon to the Supreme Court: Arizona's immigration law, same-sex marriage and President Obama's healthcare overhaul. It's unclear how the justices will configure themselves.

August 07, 2010|By David G. Savage, Tribune Washington Bureau

Last week's ruling by Judge Vaughn R. Walker striking down California's ban on same-sex marriage will almost certainly send that case to the Supreme Court. At Harvard, Kagan spoke out strongly against discrimination against gays. She called the U.S. military's ban on openly gay service members a "profound wrong and a moral injustice of the first order."

Kennedy has also written the court's two strongest gay-rights opinions. One in 1996 struck down a Colorado anti-gay voter initiative which Kennedy said was "born of animosity" toward gays. A second in 2003 struck down a Texas law that treated gays as criminals, saying that "moral disapproval" does not justify treating gays as "unequal in the eyes of the law."

In the Texas opinion, Kennedy included a caveat: The court was not saying the state "must give formal recognition to any relationship" between gays, he said then. He has been wary of the court moving ahead of public opinion on a controversial issue.

But thanks to Walker's decision, the question of a state's duty to give "formal recognition" to same-sex relationships will soon be before Kennedy and the court.

david.savage@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|