Haiti in ruins
Re “Destruction in Haiti ‘unimaginable,’ ” Jan. 14
To the credit of the Obama administration, the U.S. had disaster aid on the ground in Haiti after a 7.0 quake in less than 24 hours.
It is heartbreaking that a disaster of this magnitude should happen to the poorest of the poor. It was heartwarming to see a homeless President Rene Preval in the street, helping his people with no concern as to where he would sleep, both his residences having been destroyed.
We give so much money to unappreciative nations around the world. I hope in this case we will be even more generous to these poor people, who are our neighbors and who love and respect the United States.
Natural disasters like earthquakes and man-made disasters like war create so much suffering. Hopefully we can use our nation-building skills from our wars to bring about a better, safer Haiti.
Antonio, Gustavo, City Council, community in general:
How about a citywide effort to help Haiti? "Help Haiti Day" could include marathon poetry readings, concerts, garage sales, auctions and more.
Let's show the world that the "Angeles" in our name is not just another word . . . let's do it!
Re “Robertson links quake to devil,” Jan. 14
Pat Robertson's recent comments on the Haitian earthquake catastrophe -- in which he suggested the disaster was a potential "blessing in disguise" and evidence of that nation's cursed status thanks to its "pact with the devil" in the 18th century -- were nasty, ignorant and heartless.
Robertson's comments, and indeed the man himself, are an utter embarrassment to the evangelical Christian community. To those within that community: I hope that he is roundly condemned and removed from any position in which he may claim to speak for our faith or community in any way, shape or form.
To those without: I sincerely apologize, on behalf of evangelicals everywhere, that we have allowed such an immoral and delusional nut job to remain a public figure for far too long.
I would humbly draw your attention to the many evangelical groups (such as World Vision, the Mennonite Central Committee and others) that are working hard to actually help the devastated people of Haiti as a more accurate picture of Christian charity in response to human suffering, rather than Robertson's callousness.
The writer is an assistant professor of history at Azusa Pacific University.
Cruel, divisive Robertson has his theology reversed.
Promising to serve the devil makes one rich and powerful -- not helpless, injured and destitute. Satan offered Jesus "all the kingdoms of the world" if he would worship the demonic one. Remember, Pat?
Serving the devil is supposed to pay big dividends. Look at Haiti. Where are they?
Limit lawyers? Objection!
Re “No more room at the bench,” Opinion, Jan. 8
Mark Greenbaum thinks the government should consider steps to stop the flow of new attorneys. Balderdash! Isn't this the country that lets one study as one wants?
It is the individual who takes responsibility for student loan debts, passing the bar exam and finding employment. Would-be clients choose whom to retain. And not everyone who attends law school goes on to practice. Nobody needs the likes of Greenbaum to spare them the cost and competition.
I attended classes at an unaccredited school on nights and weekends, held down jobs, took out loans and paid them off. I graduated magna cum laude and worked for the San Diego County public defender's office for 20 years.
Why not tend to your own knitting, Mr. Greenbaum? Or are you bummed because you can't hack the competition from newbies willing to work for less?
Linda P. Hughes
Even if Greenbaum's solution is not highly questionable as a simple matter of free enterprise, nonaccreditation by bar associations does not close down a school -- nor, in California at any rate, does nonaccreditation prevent graduates from taking the bar exam and practicing law.
Apart from the "kill all the lawyers" resonance of Greenbaum's complaint, there is more than a hint of elitism.
Greenbaum asserts that we need to limit the number of new law graduates so that existing lawyers and future graduates can find gainful employment. I agree with his points, but he fails to even mention the most damaging effect of too many attorneys: too many lawsuits. An oversupply of attorneys may be bad for attorneys, but it's even worse for the rest of us.
In defense of Sen. Dodd
Re “Dodd bows out,” Editorial, Jan. 8
This Times' editorial mischaracterizes Sen. Christopher J. Dodd's (D-Conn.) personal financial dealings. He did not receive a "sweetheart deal" or "special terms" on the loans for his homes in Connecticut and Washington, and he did not underpay for a vacation home in Ireland.