Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsMoca

Critic's Notebook: Jeffrey Deitch should expand MOCA's hours, make admission free

A schedule incompatible with L.A.'s rhythms and a $10 fee keep attendance down. Evening hours and free admission have worked for other museums and can succeed here.

June 01, 2010|By Christopher Knight, Los Angeles Times Art Critic

For years, officials at the Museum of Contemporary Art have fretted over attendance. Despite a program that's arguably the nation's best, attendance in 2008 stood at 213,549. L.A. County's population nears 10 million.

The following year, after MOCA's fiscal mismanagement went public and the museum nearly collapsed, leading to reduced programs, visitor numbers dropped to 148,616. At MOCA's three venues, that's fewer than 600 people per day.

When Jeffrey Deitch takes the helm Tuesday as MOCA's fourth director in 30 years, he'll face the problem. If I were him, I'd do two things fast: Change the museum's operating hours and drop the general admission price, from $10 to zero.

Fixing hours and admission could alleviate attendance woes. Both moves require study and planning, but they would begin the long-term process of rebuilding public confidence. And the alternative — a dumbed-down program with flashier, crowd-friendly shows — is too grim to contemplate.

Let's start with general admission. It might seem counterintuitive to dump ticket fees, especially because MOCA needs money. But two sound reasons argue for it.

One is philosophical. Art is to a museum what books are to a library: Free entry positions the museum as a public service, not a commercial transaction. Then museum membership can be built around a drive to keep admission free for all. Members bring funds and become stakeholders — philanthropy by the regular guy, not just by the rich.

The other reason is practical. Ticket income rarely covers more than just a fraction of museum costs. For the fiscal year ending June 2008, as the nation's economic crisis unfolded, MOCA's admission revenues covered less than 3.5% of the annual operating budget.

That small proportion is not unusual in the not-for-profit field. For such an insignificant return, why keep people out — especially from a museum of contemporary art, which many can find daunting?

Gary Vikan, director of Baltimore's Walters Art Museum, which successfully eliminated admission fees in 2006 in tandem with the Baltimore Museum of Art across town, told me his museum's income-to-operating numbers had been roughly the same as MOCA's. He regards zeroing out admissions a huge success, and it's hard to disagree.

The Walters' attendance increased almost 40% in the first six months. Half were first-time visitors. (The Walters is a general art museum.) The initial jump has held steady for nearly four years. Notably, in a city with an African American majority population, nonwhite attendance has tripled.

And what about the current economic crisis, when museums have seen their endowments battered? The Walters' income loss was made up from a combination of public funds, private philanthropy and increased memberships from newly engaged locals. Museum income fluctuations of 3% to 4% are so common as to be insignificant; it makes sense to seize control of the one fluctuation tied to visitors, because they matter most.

"A board member said to me that it's important to be free in good times," Vikan added, "but even more important to be free in bad times."

A changed philosophy has clearly taken hold. And the Baltimore Museum of Art reports similar successes.

Lots of art museums already do have free general admission. Federal museums such as the National Gallery and the Hirshhorn do. Ditto many from the early 20th century, our first big wave of museum building in cities including St. Louis; Toledo, Ohio; and Minneapolis; plus the even older Cincinnati Art Museum and New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art. (At the Met, admission fees are voluntary.) Baltimore reinstated a free policy that, during the privatizing years of the Reagan era, had been jettisoned for charging fees.

More than a generation ago, before Proposition 13 pulled the rug out from under much of California's public sector, even a latecomer like the Los Angeles County Museum of Art was free. I was generally no fan of Andrea Rich's 10-year tenure as LACMA director (1995-2005), but two early initiatives were spot-on. Rich secured underwriting for Met-style voluntary admissions in the evening. And she changed museum hours, making those evenings possible: LACMA is now open daily (except Wednesdays) until 8 or 9 p.m.

MOCA is open daily (except Tuesdays and Wednesdays) until 5 or 6 p.m. and only on Thursdays until 8. If you work or are in school, the place is off-limits much of the time.

If you work downtown, you can skip lunch to go or come back on the weekend, which isn't likely. Stopping in after work, then maybe going out to dinner, mostly cannot happen.

The city has 40,000-plus downtown residents. A 2008 demographic study shows they're probably in their 30s and more educated and affluent than most. MOCA ought to be a natural hangout.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|