Advertisement
 

FCC not likely to wade into fee battles between broadcasters and cable providers

Advisors to FCC officials say there's no inclination to rewrite rules governing negotiations, including a request that broadcasters be prohibited from cutting their signals during fee disputes.

May 13, 2010|By Joe Flint

If the cable industry is looking for help from the Federal Communications Commission in its fights with broadcasters, it should think again.

Top advisors to the FCC's chairman and three commissioners, speaking at the National Cable & Telecommunications Assn.'s convention in Los Angeles on Wednesday, indicated that their bosses have little inclination to start regulating the disputes over the fees broadcasters want from cable operators to carry the broadcasters' channels.

Over the last several months there has been a handful of high-profile fights between broadcasters and cable operators, including Fox and Time Warner Cable and more recently ABC and Cablevison Systems, the latter of which saw ABC temporarily cut its signal, causing New Yorkers to miss a portion of the Academy Awards telecast until a deal was reached.

Several pay-TV companies, led by Time Warner Cable and Cablevision, asked the FCC in March to revisit the nearly 20-year-old "retransmission consent" rules that give broadcasters the right to seek fees from cable operators in return for carrying their channels. Specifically, the cable and satellite companies asked the FCC to forbid broadcasters from cutting off programming during carriage disputes. Instead, the distributors advocated for an arbitration system.

Sherrese Smith, a legal advisor to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, said, "We see this as a market situation," adding that most such disputes are resolved before a channel gets yanked. She did express concern that consumers could be kept in the dark on such battles.

Rosemary Harold, legal advisor to Commissioner Robert McDowell went a little further in her remarks saying, broadcasters are not acting in "bad faith" by "asking for more money."

joe.flint@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|