Advertisement
 
(Page 2 of 2)

State has enough sodium thiopental to execute four

Corrections Department won't say where the lethal-injection drug came from, and that may mean its use is forbidden.

November 08, 2010|By Carol J. Williams, Times Staff Writer

Arizona executed convicted murderer Jeffrey Landrigan on Oct. 26 after an 11th-hour dispute over the legality of using sodium thiopental obtained abroad from a source later identified as a British company. An Arizona federal judge and a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had backed a stay of execution in Landrigan's case, but the U.S. Supreme Court quashed the obstacle, saying "there is no evidence in the record to suggest that the drug obtained from a foreign source is unsafe."

The Arizona case has stirred consternation among European human rights advocates, as all nations on the continent have abolished the death penalty. Some, like Britain, have prohibited the export of instruments and materials used in executions.

Reprieve, a British-based human rights organization, and London law firm Leigh Day & Co. have sought to have sodium thiopental included in the list of banned exports. They have also filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Tennessee death row inmate scheduled to die in January.

"The issue in the meantime is the fact that the British, and the Austrians who actually supply the drug to the UK company, are making money off something that they say they disapprove of," said Reprieve's founder, Clive Stafford Smith.

carol.williams@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|