YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Sunday Conversation: Jason Alexander

The Reprise Theatre Company artistic director will star in 'They're Playing Our Song' at UCLA's Freud Playhouse.

September 27, 2010|By Irene Lacher, Special to the Los Angeles Times

Even before Jason Alexander, 51, became a household name playing George Costanza on "Seinfeld" in the '90s, he was an accomplished song-and-dance man in New York, scoring a 1989 Tony for best actor in a musical for " Jerome Robbins' Broadway." An occasional stage presence in Los Angeles, Reprise Theatre Company's artistic director stars in its revival of "They're Playing Our Song" at UCLA's Freud Playhouse from Sept. 28 through Oct. 10.

You've been artistic director of Reprise for more than three years, but you rarely perform with the company. How do you choose what you perform in, and why did you choose "They're Playing Our Song"?

I try to not have Reprise become a vanity house, so I'm very careful about when I'm onstage or when I'm directing, because any time I do it, it limits the opportunity for somebody else. Reprise has an interesting sort of alchemy to create a season. We try to do something that's a little more modern, something that's quite old, something that has a lot of dance. At the same time, we have very limited production budgets, so we have to do a big show, a small show, a medium show. "They're Playing Our Song" is a relatively small show, which is unusual — there aren't a lot of small musicals. There are eight characters, and it can be done with a relatively small orchestra, but it relies heavily on the two leads. Since this show is essentially two people, you need at least one of them to have some real star power. And the trouble with Reprise is that you only have six days in the rehearsal studio to get the show staged and under your belt. That is horrifying for most actors. I did not believe that we would find an actor of note to take that on, and that's why I took it.

Why did you add songs to this production?

"They're Playing Our Song" was created very quickly the first time around. Marvin [Hamlisch] and Carole [Bayer Sager] had been working on a musical version of Neil Simon's "The Gingerbread Lady," and they were having their relationship squabbles and Neil thought they were adorable and said, "Let's do this [show based on their relationship]." It moved from concept to production very, very fast. I've heard the term six weeks thrown around. The result is, for me, there aren't a lot of songs in the show. The average two-act Broadway musical has 12 to 14 songs, and then there can be encores and reprises as well. "Playing Our Song" only had eight original songs and several reprises. It's really a play with music as opposed to a fully fleshed-out musical. So I thought, "Wouldn't it be great if Neil and Marvin and Carole were open to fleshing out that score a little more to make it a fuller-feeling musical?" They all seemed willing to give it a shot.

People are always taking the temperature of musical theater. So how's it doing?

It depends on where you are. Certainly in New York, you can't find a play on Broadway right now — they're all musicals. L.A. is a very strange town for theater in general, but the things that do make big splashes here are certain musicals. They tend to be spectacular event musicals — "Lion King," "The Producers," " Wicked." There's a definite audience for it, and Reprise has had that audience as our subscriber base going on 15 years now. But the truth is, doing theater in L.A. is just hard. The problem is in theater, like every other medium in our business right now, the business models are all straining at the seams. And producing a musical is a very expensive proposition, and the only way anyone knows to compensate for it right now is to keep raising the ticket prices. Certainly in New York, but we have to be careful of it here too, you can price yourself right out of your audience. The average person cannot spend $100 a ticket to go see a musical for an evening, and when you add travel and parking and food, you're almost at $150, $200 per person. That's untenable. All of us have to come up with a new way of doing these things where they can be done with integrity and artistry, but we're not making our audience elitist.

What do you think is strange about the L.A. theater scene?

Los Angeles Times Articles