Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsBusiness

MUTUAL FUND QUARTERLY REPORT

Small- and mid-cap stock funds lead the way

In part, the continuing performance streak of smaller stocks reflects Wall Street's growing sense that the U.S. economy is unlikely to fall off a cliff again.

April 10, 2011|By Tom Petruno, Los Angeles Times

Smaller stocks far outraced their blue-chip brethren in the last decade. Now, they're sprinting well ahead once again, defying predictions that big-name shares would take the lead in market performance.

Mutual funds that own stocks of so-called small-cap and mid-cap companies racked up gains of 6.9% to 9.4%, on average, in the three months that ended March 31, according to fund tracker Lipper Inc.

By contrast, large-cap stock funds posted first-quarter total returns averaging less than 6%.

The story was much the same in 2010, when small-cap and mid-cap funds generated gains of 20% or better versus returns in the mid-teens for large-cap funds. A fund's total return includes the change in its share price plus any dividends it pays.

In part, the continuing performance streak of smaller stocks reflects Wall Street's growing sense that the U.S. economy is unlikely to fall off a cliff again. When investors conclude the economy will keep improving, they naturally become willing to bet on riskier enterprises, including smaller firms.

"Small companies tend to be more focused and less diversified than bigger ones. This can be fatal during recessions but may be a big positive during expansions," said Edward Yardeni, head of Yardeni Research Inc. in New York.

Don Wordell, manager of the RidgeWorth Mid-Cap Value Equity fund in Orlando, Fla., notes that the U.S. financial system has healed further over the last year and that private-sector job growth finally has begun to pick up.

"When I look at the overall environment, I am more encouraged" about the economy, he said.

Still, many market pros had expected investors to shift their focus to blue-chip shares this year. One argument in favor of big-name multinational stocks was that their global reach offered better potential growth prospects in 2011 than those of many smaller, niche companies.

Another argument was simply that large-cap stocks had become bargains relative to earnings as many investors ignored them and chose other places for their money in 2010 — not just smaller stocks, but also commodities and corporate bonds.

Classic "value" investors such as Jeremy Grantham, co-founder of money manager Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. in Boston, were making the case for big stocks over other ideas early this year. In a letter to clients in January, Grantham described the highest-quality blue-chips as "very cheap."

By one common yardstick, blue-chips appear compelling: The average price-to-earnings ratio of the Standard & Poor's 500 index of big-company stocks is 13.7 based on estimated 2011 operating earnings per share, according to S&P.

By comparison, the P/E ratio is 19.0 for the S&P index of 600 small-cap stocks and 18.3 for the S&P mid-cap 400-stock index.

Still, the momentum has stayed with small- and mid-cap stocks. The S&P small-cap index gained 3% in March and the mid-cap index rose 2.4%, while the S&P 500 was largely unchanged.

Satya Pradhuman, who tracks small stocks as head of Cirrus Research in Tarrytown, N.Y., said one explanation for investors' robust appetite for the companies is the expectation that bank lending conditions will continue to ease. Access to credit is key to many smaller companies' success, he said.

As credit conditions improve, "you see the top line accelerate for small-cap companies," Pradhuman said. "That's what extends the cycle [for the stocks' performance] longer than people think."

Some market players cite another force driving the stocks: They say smaller issues are favorite targets of hedge funds and other investors with relatively short-term time horizons and a desire to get more bang for their equity buck. After all, it takes less money to drive up a small-cap stock than shares of Wal-Mart Stores or Cisco Systems.

Generally, a small-cap company is one whose market capitalization (stock price multiplied by the number of shares outstanding) is less than $2 billion, and a mid-cap company is one with a market cap of between $2 billion and $10 billion. Large caps are the minority — firms whose shares are worth $10 billion or more.

But just as speculators can quickly drive up smaller stocks, they also could quickly drive them down by bailing out if sentiment about the economy should turn bleak.

For investors who worry that the smallest stocks may be too frothy after their latest run-up but who also see blue-chips as too stodgy, mid-size stocks may be a good compromise.

The mid-cap sector has gained a reputation as the market's "sweet spot" over the last decade or so. In the 15 years that ended March 31, the S&P mid-cap index produced a total return of 419%, compared with 302% for the S&P small-cap index and 168% for the S&P 500.

Proponents of the mid-cap sector say the companies tend to be more seasoned than smaller firms and more financially stable, yet aren't handicapped by size as some blue-chips are.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|