Advertisement

Scientists surprised by Genesis mission's solar wind data

Solar wind particles from NASA's Genesis mission suggest unexpected differences in the composition of the sun and inner planets.

May 09, 2011|By Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times
  • In this image from a 2004 NASA video, a man reaches NASA's Genesis spacecraft, which plunged into salt flats in Utah at 193 mph after its parachute failed to deploy.
In this image from a 2004 NASA video, a man reaches NASA's Genesis spacecraft,… (Reuters )

The 2004 crash-landing of a returning NASA space capsule in the deserts of Utah had scientists fearing for a while that samples collected by the Genesis mission, sent to capture particles from the sun's solar wind, were lost.

But much of the collected material survived the crash, and it's now turning up surprises: discrepancies between the composition of the sun and the inner solar system, which contains the sun's four closest planets, including Earth.

The early report, published online Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows among other things that the pattern of isotopes in the solar wind — and thus, presumably, the sun — is very different from that of the inner planets.

Genesis launched in 2001 and flew to a point nearly 1 million miles from the Earth to collect solar wind particles — blown off the sun's surface at high speeds — from a region in space unaffected by the Earth's magnetic field. The spacecraft was about to land, samples safely tucked away, when its parachute failed to deploy and the capsule smashed into the ground.

"Coming back to Earth was not a happy event for us," said mission principal investigator Donald Burnett, a geochemist at Caltech. "We literally went out and picked up the pieces in Utah and came back — and managed to pick out some important science."

Like the planets, the sun contains various amounts of oxygen, nitrogen and other elements. But each element can come in heavier or lighter forms, called isotopes, depending on how many neutrons they have. The proportions of heavier oxygen to lighter oxygen, and so on, are a feature that cosmochemists thought the planets would share with the sun, since they were ultimately formed out of the same coalescing cloud of dust and gas.

But it appears that there are significant differences. The Earth, for example, has more heavier oxygen in relation to lighter oxygen than does the sun — and that is at odds with current theories of space chemistry.

"We used to think that the sun and solar system were all made of the same stuff and things were pretty well mixed up," said Andrew M. Davis, a cosmochemist at the University of Chicago who is chairman of an independent committee that helps decide who in the scientific community gets to use the retrieved samples. "But somehow the sun ended up a little different from the Earth. We haven't figured out what it all means yet — but it's clearly important, and it's making people rethink old ideas."

A broader report on findings from the mission is planned for publication within the next few weeks.

amina.khan@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|