Advertisement

Can Jane Pratt's xoJane.com preach to the snarky?

Sassy magazine's former editor, who spawned a generation of witty and cynical female bloggers, hopes her site appeals to 18- to 49-year-olds.

May 29, 2011|By Taffy Brodesser-Akner, Special to the Los Angeles Times
  • Emily McCombs, managing editor, left, Jane Pratt, creator, and Cat Marnell of Sassy and Jane magazines, now have a new website for women.
Emily McCombs, managing editor, left, Jane Pratt, creator, and Cat Marnell… (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles…)

Before its launch a few weeks ago, frenzied reports of the coming of xoJane.com had the same gossipy, mythic quality that accompanied James Franco's academic career or, say, the birth of Shiloh Jolie-Pitt: confusion, rumor and a little cattiness.

It isn't surprising that the website's launch was greeted with such mixed feelings, because it's the new online women's magazine from Jane Pratt aimed at the audience that she helped raise, first as founder of the teen magazine Sassy in 1988 and then of Jane magazine, aimed at the 18-34 market, in 1997. This time, Pratt , 48, also hopes to include her age group, making the target demo 18-49. (xoJane will be followed in a few months by a little sister blog whose name keeps changing. It'll be "an xoJane.com for teenagers," according to Pratt, who has partnered with 14-year-old fashion blogger Tavi Gevinson.)

Pratt forged a reputation in the magazine world for talking to girls and young women in a more intimate and confessional voice than her competitors. And she managed to build a hard-core, loyal audience, even inspiring a book, Kara Jesella and Marisa Meltzer's "How Sassy Changed My Life: A Love Letter to the Greatest Teen Magazine of All Time."

Despite a successful Sirius XM radio show (and a couple of short-lived TV talk shows), Pratt has been largely absent from media conversation since she left Jane in 2005. Will the now-adult audience that absorbed Pratt's sensibility — indeed, it's Pratt who is often credited with the snarky, tell-it-like-it-is voice of women's blogs like Jezebel and the Hairpin — flock to xoJane? Can she translate her magazine voice to the online medium, and does she fully understand the rules of the space she's entering?

"I realized that less and less was I going to the newsstand and buying magazines and more I was going online. That's where I felt like the audience of women that I'd been talking to was," said Pratt, who brought in investors Say Media about four months ago.

"I felt like so many of the things I tried with Sassy were very primitive," she said. "I really wanted to get a lot of reader involvement and get the readers' voices into the magazine. But at the time, it meant doing a contest, waiting for the mail, then flying people to New York. Or even the letters to the editor, how long it took to get peoples' responses.... Now the technology existed for me to do it in the way I really want to do it."

In an area of xoJane.com called Jane's Stuff, readers can access video, notes, emails, and texts on her iPhone. One post was a picture of an outfit Pratt was wearing; she polled readers on the question: "Outfit good or ridiculous?" Elsewhere on the site, writers join in the comments-section conversation.

But is Pratt too late? She's entered a space already crowded with lady-bloggers brandishing the chatty, intimate voice she helped hone when many of them were just young Sassy readers.

"I don't see that this is filling a space that was empty"," said Jessica Grose, managing editor of DoubleX, the women's site on Slate.com. "There's Shine. There's Jezebel. There's the Hairpin."

As for whether Pratt's audience owes her a debt for the tone that runs rampant through these sites, Grose said, "I don't want to downplay how much Sassy affected people. But I think it would be overstating the case that there would be no Internet confessional culture without it."

Pratt herself doesn't take credit for anything that's on the Web right now, and she doesn't suggest that xoJane will start another revolution.

"Is this going to be radically different compared to what is accessible to this audience now?" Pratt asked. "No, I don't think so. Is it giving people stuff that they're not getting from other places? Does it have a feeling of community that people are going to want to come back to? I really hope so."

But in trying to hard to capture the voices of 18-, 35- and 49-year-olds, the tone is rubbing some people the wrong way.

"I am struck by how much the site seems like a self-parody," said Ada Calhoun, 35, an author and journalist who wrote an extensive, disappointed critique of the site on her blog, 90swoman. "Sassy was a character, like a person you knew. xoJane seems robotic, like it was programmed to spit out these phrases."

Even the woman who literally co-wrote the book on Sassy had harsh words about xoJane. "It has the feel of magazine people doing a website," said Jesella, 35, who is also a former Teen Vogue editor. "Do you really want to read a story that long about wearing a nude body suit on the Web?" The piece in question is 1,000 words.

The criticism doesn't surprise Pratt. "Everyone hated Sassy when it came out," she said. "A few years later, people said that Sassy used to be good but now it's terrible. Then, with Jane, people said it was no Sassy. Then it was, 'Jane used to be good, now it's terrible.' I fully expect people to say the site didn't live up."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|