Advertisement

Q&A: For Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, taking risks has paid off

Jones purchased the team in 1989 when it was losing $1 million a month. Now Dallas is the league's richest franchise, valued at $1.8 billion.

November 06, 2011|By Sam Farmer
  • Cowboys owner Jerry Jones walks on the field before a game last month at Cowboy Stadium.
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones walks on the field before a game last month at Cowboy… (Sharon Ellman / Associated…)

In the NFL, everyone tries to keep up with the Joneses.

And for good reason.

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has transformed a franchise that was losing $1 million per month in 1989, into the league's richest team, one valued by Forbes at $1.8 billion. Despite their struggles on the field, the Cowboys are routinely at the top when it comes to number of prime-time games, sponsorship revenue, TV viewership numbers, and merchandise sales. In fact, their cheerleaders even outsell many NFL teams in merchandise.

The Cowboys' $1.3-billion stadium is the most luxurious and largest this country has ever known.

Even with the on-field success of such teams as the New England Patriots, Indianapolis Colts, New Orleans Saints and Green Bay Packers, the Cowboys are still called "America's Team," despite going a club-record 15 seasons without a Super Bowl appearance. Since winning three Super Bowls in Jones' first five years of ownership, the Cowboys have recorded two playoff victories.

At his Valley Ranch office in Irving, Texas, Jones recently met with Los Angeles Times NFL writer Sam Farmer for a lengthy interview on a wide range of topics, from the risk he took in buying the team, to his friendship with late Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis, to the future of the NFL in L.A.

Why was buying the Cowboys such a risk?

At the time, we had had two flat television negotiations in the NFL. The NBA was booming. Talk of maybe becoming more popular than the NFL. I bought 13% of the team from the government because it had been foreclosed on. It was losing a million a month in cash flow. And I paid more for it than had ever been paid for anything in the history of sports. About $154 million.

Did you have any second thoughts?

The first time I came down with an eye to buy the team, the owner at the time, Bum Bright, had Roger Staubach sit with me, [my wife] Gene and [our daughter] Charlotte, and we watched the Cowboys play a home game against the Giants.

On one side of the field was Bill Parcells. On the side I was on, you had Tom Landry with the Cowboys. Thirty-two thousand people were there — 32,000! And just to make sure that I could handle it, I went down in the fourth quarter and sat in the stands. The stadium couldn't sell beer and liquor, but they let coolers come in. So people had beer and liquor in coolers. So I was sitting there, with 80,000 beer cans on the floor, whiskey bottles everywhere. They were just remnants of the people that were there. I just wanted to sit there and see how it would feel if I had made that commitment, to see if I could handle those conditions. I must have thought I could, because I bought the team.

What was the economy like in Texas at the time?

It looked like a nuclear bomb had gone off here. There were things around this town that were selling for a nickel on the dollar for what had been loaned against it three and four years earlier. A nickel. Because nothing could move, nobody could borrow any money, and only cash talked. If it hadn't been that way, the opportunity to buy the Cowboys wouldn't have been there.

Now, 22 years later, are you more risk averse?

No. Just look at our new stadium. I thought I'd danced with the devil when I bought it and lived to tell about it, and then turned right around and was 50 feet in the ground when we had the worst economic hit of anyone in our lifetime. That's not risk aversion.

The NFL would be taking a risk, wouldn't it, in returning to the Los Angeles market? What's the appetite for that?

Our interest in Los Angeles is at the highest levels of any kind of measurement that you want to measure. Right now. We in the NFL unquestionably are in sports and competition, but we're also in entertainment, and that's the entertainment capital of the world. It just bowls you over when you see the opportunity in L.A.

You have said before that the NFL cannot become a "studio game," and be better to watch on TV than in person. What kind of challenge does that present, even with the giant video board at your stadium?

Television has always been our No. 1 competition. But I know firsthand that you can create an experience you can't get on television. I also know that the social experience has an appeal. When you come to our stadium and look at the aura of 100,000 people. You look up there and see an Army tank coming at you. You see it on a TV screen it's one thing. You see it at a movie theater that's something else. When that thing's coming at you 70 feet high and 180 feet long, now that looks like a tank.

Why don't you have a naming rights deal for your stadium yet?

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|