YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

There's no end of apocalypse movies

Filmmakers have never been able to resist delving into the tension of an approaching disaster, the excitement of meeting its fury, or the bleakness of life in the aftermath.

October 09, 2011|By Dennis Lim, Special to the Los Angeles Times
  • Kirsten Dunst in the movie "Melancholia."
Kirsten Dunst in the movie "Melancholia." (Magnolia Pictures / Magnolia…)

In the movies, almost as a rule, the world ends with a bang. Fireballs engulf entire cities; asteroids crash into Earth; vast swaths of humanity are swallowed up in the iconic form of a radioactive mushroom cloud. The prospect of extinction — or, as Susan Sontag put it, "the imagination of disaster" — has been a cinematic staple since the days of Cold War science fiction, with its chronic, allegorical fear of alien invasion.

Planetary annihilation was the grim punch line of the classics of nuclear cinema ("Kiss Me Deadly," "Dr. Strangelove," "Twilight's Last Gleaming"), and it has long been the nihilistic come-on of action blockbusters such as "Independence Day," "Armageddon" and "2012."

But strictly speaking, most apocalypse films do not imagine the end so much as a close encounter with it. The point is not to confront but to avert the ultimate disaster. And much of apocalypse-themed cinema is more precisely termed post-apocalypse. In films as varied as the "Mad Max" trilogy, "Children of Men," "The Road," "28 Days Later," "La Jetée" and "12 Monkeys," the heroes are the few hardy survivors navigating a depopulated wasteland and implicitly tasked with ensuring a future for the human race after the worst has happened.

Pre-apocalypse films — the ones that stare into the void, that dare to imagine what the end of all things would look and feel like — are an altogether rarer, not to mention quieter, breed. And as the current glut of doomsday dramas suggests, these films are more likely to be found at the art house than the multiplex. It's not exactly that the world ends with a whimper in these movies, but the final cataclysm is usually suggested with the sparest of special effects, if at all. Less attention is paid to the pyrotechnics of disaster than on the specter of mortality and the interior states of those living through the end times: terror, anxiety, wonder, acceptance.

To come to terms with The End, then, takes a cinema not of spectacle but of contemplation. The mere thought of universal extinction instantly gives human drama a cosmic significance. A case in point: Terrence Malick's "The Tree of Life," a film of ultimate beginnings and ends. Striving for nothing less than eternal truths, Malick frames the sense memories of a 1950s Texas childhood within the largest possible context: the life cycle of the universe, from Big Bang to final flameout.

Billed as "a beautiful movie about the end of the world," Lars von Trier's "Melancholia" (which many compared to "The Tree of Life" at the Cannes Film Festival this year) also counterpoints earthly and celestial tragedies. It begins with the end — a hyper-stylized, Wagner-scored premonition of the cataclysmic collision between Earth and the wayward planet Melancholia — then settles into a tense family drama, as its depressive heroine (Kirsten Dunst) and her seemingly better-adjusted sister (Charlotte Gainsbourg) await the arrival of the giant blue orb in the sky.

As in "Melancholia," the apocalypse in "Take Shelter," the new film by the young American director Jeff Nichols, looms on the horizon, here in the form of gathering storm clouds and prophetic nightmares. But the sense of imminent disaster is deliberately ambiguous — inseparable from the nameless dread of modern American existence and perhaps existing only in the head of its unstable, deeply paranoid hero (Michael Shannon).

In "The Turin Horse," the latest from the Hungarian maestro of miserablism Béla Tarr (set for a U.S. release next year from Cinema Guild), doomsday is not depicted so much as evoked. Tarr chronicles the spare, ritualistic existence of a father and daughter, holed up in a ramshackle cabin as a ferocious wind all but sweeps away the outside world, and a palpable feeling of doom eventually overwhelms the film.

More precise in its countdown structure — the global lights-out is timed to the minute — Abel Ferrara's "4:44 Last Day on Earth," also due to open next year (through IFC Films), observes a New York couple (Willem Dafoe and Shanyn Leigh) in their final hours together as the planet braces itself for environmentally induced extinction.

Whatever the reason for the onslaught of these death-haunted movies — 2012 cultists, rapture believers and hard-nosed rationalists will all have their own theories — it's worth noting that dramas of terminal despair are hardly unprecedented. Ingmar Bergman and Andrei Tarkovsky, masters of spiritual anguish, both made apocalyptic films.

Bleak even by Bergman standards, "Shame" (1968) concerns a married couple who flee a civil war only to have it show up at their doorstep, and the domestic drama widens to encompass what comes to feel like the end of humanity. In Tarkovsky's final film, "The Sacrifice" (1986), a birthday gathering is interrupted by the outbreak of World War III, prompting its stricken protagonist into a fateful pact with God.

Los Angeles Times Articles