Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsBusiness

The rich are getting richer, U.S. study says

The top 1% of households earned 275% more in 2007 than they did in 1979, while the poor saw just an 18% increase, according to a study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

October 27, 2011|By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times
  • Occupy Wall Street protesters have criticized the wealth of the 1%.
Occupy Wall Street protesters have criticized the wealth of the 1%. (Carolyn Cole, Los Angeles…)

Reporting from Washington — The rich got richer over the last three decades — and the very rich got very much richer — according to a new government study.

The top 1% of households saw their after-tax incomes grow by 275% from 1979 to 2007, said the study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. That was more than quadruple the growth of the rest of the top 20% of the population during that period.

Meanwhile, income for the 60% of households that make up the middle of the income scale increased by slightly less than 40%, the study found. The poor — the 20% of the population with the lowest incomes — saw just an 18% increase.

"As a result of that uneven income growth, the distribution of after-tax household income in the United States was substantially more unequal in 2007 than in 1979," said the report, released Wednesday.

Indeed, the share of all U.S. after-tax income that went to the top 1% doubled during that period to more than 17% from about 8%.

The findings came as protesters have occupied parks near Wall Street, Los Angeles City Hall and elsewhere around the country, decrying the growing wealth and influence of what they call "the 1%." The protesters have declared themselves "the 99%."

Overall, inflation-adjusted, after-tax income for the entire population rose 62% from 1979 to 2007.

The report said the exact cause of the rapid income growth for the richest Americans is unclear, but researchers have some theories: soaring salaries of superstar actors, athletes and musicians; more liberal executive compensation; and the growth of the financial sector.

At the same time, "the equalizing effect of federal taxes was smaller," the report said. The overall average federal tax rate fell slightly during the period because of income tax cuts, and the tax system did less to balance out incomes because of rate cuts for high earners.

Rep. Sander M. Levin (D-Mich.) said Wednesday that the report was "just the latest evidence of the alarming rise in income inequality in this country."

"This report confirms what the American people already know: The rules have been changed by the unfair tax policies of the last decade, and our tax code is doing less to level the playing field than it was in the past," he said.

President Obama has proposed that the tax code be changed so people earning more than $1 million a year pay at least the same tax rate as middle-class earners. He called the principle the "Buffett Rule," after billionaire Warren Buffett, who has complained that he pays a lower tax rate than anyone in his office at Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Republicans, including House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), have decried the measure, saying it could incite "class warfare."

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|