Advertisement
 

Obama alienating some Democratic moderates with fiscal stance

The president's decision to stand firmly against Republicans on taxes and spending isn't sitting well with the party's centrists, many of whom are up for reelection next year.

September 22, 2011|By Kathleen Hennessey, Washington Bureau
  • Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson said of President Obama's hardened demand that spending cuts be paired with new revenue for deficit reduction: I dont think very much of it. Any kind of revenue enhancement or tax talk has to come, in my opinion, second to the cutting."
Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson said of President Obama's hardened demand… (Chip Somodevilla, Getty…)

Reporting from Washington — President Obama's decision to go toe-to-toe with Republicans in the fight over taxes and spending won approval from many Democrats — but may have moved him farther from his party's moderates, many of whom will be fighting for their careers next year.

Several centrist Democrats have responded to Obama's new tack with lukewarm praise, outright criticism or loaded silence. Some expressed skepticism about the president's commitment to his approach and of his ability to control the debate as Republican opposition escalates. Others opted for a wait-and-see approach or bemoaned the president's apparent shift away from the middle of the road.

The reaction puts a spotlight on the distance some lawmakers are placing between themselves and a president whose popularity has plummeted — an awkward space likely to become more prominent as 2012 campaigns heat up.

Staking out fiscally conservative positions, Democrats over the last several elections have managed to steal voters from Republicans in some unlikely places, such as Montana and Virginia. But many moderates lost their seats in 2010, and those who remain are nervous about the campaign and aren't eager to embrace the president's call for tax hikes, even increases aimed at the wealthiest Americans.

"I don't think very much of it," Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said when asked about Obama's hardened demand that spending cuts be paired with new revenue for deficit reduction. "Any kind of revenue enhancement or tax talk has to come, in my opinion, second to the cutting. We have a spending issue, as well as a revenue issue, but we have to solve them separately."

Sen. Jon Tester, a Montana Democrat facing a strong challenge in a red state, said Obama's proposal was "not the one I would have written, nor is it the one that will end up passing Congress."

To be sure, neither lawmaker is representative of the Democratic caucus. More liberal Democrats have spent months urging the president to abandon his conciliatory tone toward the GOP-controlled House. After watching the president haggle with and be rebuffed by Republicans in the debt ceiling fight this summer, they applauded what appears to be a new course.

"He started from a hard-core position, which is a position he believes in and I believe in," said Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.). "Maybe he's going to have to give ground, but at least he didn't offer ground."

But the reaction from moderate Democrats may be a gauge of the challenges awaiting Obama in crucial swing states, such as Virginia, Florida and Pennsylvania, as he struggles to hold together a broad and disjointed coalition.

Obama has offered two major legislative proposals in recent weeks: a jobs bill for next year that would cut payroll taxes and other levies and increase spending on infrastructure such as roads and bridges; and a longer-term deficit-reduction plan that would raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans and trim the cost of Medicare.

Neither plan is likely to pass the GOP-led House intact, Democrats acknowledge.

The long-term deficit-reduction plan, in particular, seems unlikely to achieve any Republican support. As a political matter, Obama's backers hang their hopes on polling that shows key elements have strong support beyond the Democratic base. A new Gallup poll showed two-thirds of Americans support a higher tax rate for the top income bracket, and 70% support closing loopholes that benefit corporations.

But doubters — both of the politics and the policy — remain.

Centrist Democrats pride themselves on changing the party's image as home to tax-hungry liberals wanting to redistribute wealth. Many view it as a step back to return to a strategy of focusing on tax hikes. (The godfather of modern centrists, former President Clinton, did Obama no favors Wednesday by saying he didn't believe "we ought to be raising taxes or cutting spending" right now.)

For others, the resistance to jumping on board stems from wariness about whether the administration will stay in the fight.

"The president got off to a good start. If he would stay on that message, I think we'd have a good chance," said Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, a Democrat from Louisiana who has been critical of the administration's focus on closing loopholes for oil and gas companies. On Tuesday, Landrieu said she supported the broad goals of Obama's plan.

Some top GOP targets in next year's elections — Sens. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania — declined to comment on the specifics of Obama's deficit-reduction plan.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|