Dear Liz: My husband and I are nearing 60. The company where we both have worked for over 30 years recently merged with another firm. The money in our retirement accounts, which totals several hundred thousand dollars, will be distributed to us, and we need to figure out how to manage it.
We took your advice to interview several fee-only financial planners, and all of them are pushing for wealth management. They would manage the money in exchange for a percentage of the assets. How do we find an unbiased opinion of whether it is worth it to spend over $10,000 a year for this service rather than putting that money toward our retirement?
I find it doubtful that any of the planners can earn a return that would be worth at least $10,000 a year. We're with Vanguard's Target Fund 2020, which we currently use for retirement funds we have gathered outside of work.
Answer: You're right that a financial planner — or any money manager, for that matter — is unlikely to offer returns substantially above what you would get in passive investments that seek to match the market, rather than beat it. Study after study shows that few investors, professional or amateur, can consistently outperform the stock market averages.
What wealth management should provide is a suite of services to help you in all areas of your financial life. You should get a comprehensive financial plan as well as assistance with your taxes, insurance needs and estate planning.
Your investments should be targeted to your specific needs, time horizon and risk tolerance. Your planner should advise you about sustainable withdrawal rates once you retire, so that you minimize the risk of running out of money.
Your planner should be willing to act as your fiduciary, meaning your needs come first, so you don't have to worry about the conflicts of interest that may arise when an advisor is recommending products that pay him or her commissions. The best wealth managers, in short, provide a one-stop shop that alleviates the need for you to try to coordinate all these services yourself.
If you don't feel you need this level of service, however, seek out a fee-only planner who works by the hour. You can find referrals to this type of fee-only planner from the Garrett Planning Network at http://www.garrettplanningnetwork.com.
Don't sweat different high FICO scores
Dear Liz: I just bought a home and my FICO credit scores are excellent: 842, 813 and 809. I requested copies of my files from all three credit bureaus, and one of them — which showed me with the lowest score — said the reason my score wasn't higher is that I had "too many inquiries in the last two months" (I had two, one of which was for my mortgage) and an "insufficient length of credit history" (my first credit account was opened in 1980). I called the bureau, but the representative wouldn't give me any more information and just wanted to sell me my credit score for $7.95. The person I talked to was in India, which upset me even more. If companies want to outsource to foreign lands, that's up to them, but they are making money of off every American's personal history. We should have a right to keep our personal information here in the U.S. I have emailed my lawmakers about this, but what more can I do?
Answer: One of the things you can do is stop worrying about why your credit scores aren't higher. Once you get above 760 or so on the 300-to-850 FICO scale, you'll get the best rates and terms from virtually any lender. The software that provides the scores is set up to spit out "reason codes" for why your numbers are the way they are, but the higher your scores, the less relevant those reasons may be. The software has to tell you something, even if "fixing" the "problem" wouldn't really affect your numbers.
You also need to stop turning to the credit bureaus for information about your scores. Although they sell FICO scores to lenders, the bureaus use a proprietary formula purchased from another company (also called FICO). The bureaus can't really tell you much more about how the formula works than you could find out for yourself at MyFico.com, which is a site FICO co-founded. Plus, the credit scores the bureaus want to sell to you typically aren't the FICO scores used by most lenders.
As for your right to decide where your credit information is kept, in effect you have none. The credit reporting system was set up to benefit lenders, not consumers. If you want to change that, continue contacting your lawmakers.
Questions may be sent to 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604 or via http://www.asklizweston.com. Distributed by No More Red Inc.