Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsEducation

A teachable moment for Deasy, teacher

The superintendent's tiff last year with a substitute teacher in a South L.A. honors composition class diverts attention from systemic problems keeping students from progressing.

April 10, 2012|Sandy Banks
  • L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy isn't apologizing for arguing with a South L.A. substitute teacher who had 12th-grade students copy a list of classroom rules into their composition books.
L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy isn't apologizing for arguing with… (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles…)

It was just one morning out of 365, one campus visit out of more than 500 that Los Angeles Unified School District Supt. John Deasy managed in his first year on the job.

But the superintendent's classroom battle with a substitute teacher at Washington Prep High School says as much about the district's struggles and prospects as any schoolyard story or test score stats.

The anecdote was included in The Times' Sunday profile of Deasy, who has garnered mostly good reviews in his relentless — and some say insufferably impatient — efforts to improve L.A.'s public schools.

Deasy has made high expectations the central tenet of that campaign. Too little is expected, he says, of the district's poor and minority students. They can achieve at high levels if we don't settle; if we push and encourage and challenge them.

That's why Deasy blew his top last fall when he encountered students in a 12th-grade English class copying a list of classroom rules into their composition books.

Busywork, he called it. An insult to their potential. A disrespectful waste of time in an Honors Composition course.

He told the students as much, then asked their teacher, Patrena Shankling, what they were supposed to be learning from this.

Shankling was a substitute. It was the second day of the fall semester, and she was following the teacher's lesson plan. She didn't appreciate being scolded by Deasy in front of the students in her class.

They wound up in a shouting match. She ordered Deasy to leave, he threatened to have her removed, she said.

One day later, Shankling, substitute No. 970595, was banned from teaching in L.A. Unified.

The dust-up sounds pretty dramatic. One student called it "an altercation." Another chronicled Deasy's visit as if it were a crime report: "On the date of September 8, 2011, an unknown Caucasian male walked inside the class observing everyone."

The students didn't know who Deasy was when the superintendent walked in with 10 minutes left in third period.

Neither did their teacher. "Based on his overall appearance, I assumed he was an LAUSD official," Shankling wrote in a statement that day. "He did not introduce himself or acknowledge me in any way."

She describes an "agitated" tirade by Deasy. In a writing assignment four days later, given by another instructor, most students took the teacher's side, characterizing the district boss as "nasty … aggressive … rude … mad."

"Super attendant or not," one girl wrote, "he should have shown some respect."

But the "super attendant" wasn't the only one who came out looking bad.

"They both were very unprofessional," another student wrote. "This whole situation could have been settled more civilized and professional then what it was."

I reached Shankling on Monday as she was working in her garden. She's been a part-time sub for 10 years; has a master's degree, runs a tax consulting firm and enjoyed working at Washington Prep, a short walk from her home.

One of the teachers she's subbed for wrote a letter of support that reads like a report card: "Ms. Shankling is … conscientious, committed, competent … punctual, well-groomed … an excellent record-keeper who understands the importance of accuracy."

I get the feeling Deasy is looking for more in teachers than accuracy and good grooming.

Still, I understand why Shankling bristled over Deasy's outburst. "The students write down classroom procedures … so the rules are clear," she told me. "So if someone is not prepared, there are no excuses or arguments."

If Deasy thinks the exercise shortchanges students, "he could have asked me to step outside to talk about it," she said. "The problem was not the assignment. The problem was his behavior.

"He's a bully, to walk in there and disrespect a teacher the way he did. It's so easy for him to talk about what students don't have. A lot of what they don't have is respect."

Deasy's not apologizing for his reaction. His frustration had reached the boiling point:

"I'm sitting with students who have not dropped out, who have not quit, who are the most likely to go to college. And I'm watching them copying rules that were handed to them into a notebook. I struggle with that. I struggle with it a lot.

"We have a shortened school year, and so many [other] issues," he said. "This is not the way we want to use the time for students. Teaching the conventions of writing might have been a better use of their time in class."

At Washington Prep, in South Los Angeles, only 5% of students are proficient in math and 20% in English. And only about 40% of the freshman class makes it to graduation.

After reading student essays on the classroom spat — riddled with misspellings, fragments and run-on sentences — I'd have to agree with Deasy's assessment.

But their deficiencies are not only the fault of that sub, or the absent teacher or even the high school that's about to graduate them.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|