YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


Three solid picks for Superior Court

Sean Coen, Andrea Thompson and Eric Harmon get The Times' endorsement for open seats on the court.

April 22, 2012
  • The front plaza of the Los Angeles County Superior Court is shown. The L.A. Superior Court is the nation's largest trial court of general jurisdiction.
The front plaza of the Los Angeles County Superior Court is shown. The L.A.… (Los Angeles Times )

The Los Angeles Superior Court is the nation's largest trial court of general jurisdiction, with at any one time about 450 judges hearing complex commercial lawsuits, landlord-tenant disputes, misdemeanor and felony prosecutions, divorce and child custody disputes, conservatorships and guardianships, adoption and foster care matters, traffic cases and plenty more besides.

Superior Court: An April 22 endorsement of judicial candidates referred to the 10 years of State Bar membership required for a California trial judge and stated that Matthew Schonbrun "won't notch his decade until the day after the election." Schonbrun reaches the 10-year mark the day before the election. —

Most judges are appointed by the governor to fill vacancies left by those who retired or otherwise left office before the end of one of their six-year terms. Incumbents then come before voters to be elected for another six years, at least in theory. If no candidate challenges a sitting judge who is up for reelection, the incumbent wins automatically and his or her name does not even go on the ballot. That is why voters in Los Angeles County do not see 150 judicial offices on their ballots every two years, and thank goodness.

But some judges do get challenged, as was the case with three this year. The Times endorsed in those races Friday, and our selections are restated below.

And some seats remain open and go to the voters when the governor has declined or failed to appoint someone to fill a vacancy by the statutory deadline. In Los Angeles, there are three such seats this year, featuring 10 candidates.

The Times makes its recommendations after meeting with and interviewing the candidates, watching them in action in court when possible, and speaking with those who work with them to learn something about their levels of expertise, integrity, fairness, industriousness and civility. We look for attorneys who know their way around a courtroom and a case file, and those who can command respect in the midst of an emotion-laden proceeding without becoming imperious or dictatorial.

Office 3: Sean Coen

Coen brings the right combination of courtroom expertise, integrity and calm demeanor. He is a Los Angeles deputy district attorney, as are many candidates, and it's no surprise. Prosecuting criminal cases provides rigorous training in the law and courtroom procedure, but more to the point, it puts lawyers in a position to observe and learn from the best and worst judges, and the best and worst attorneys, on a daily basis. It also puts those judges and attorneys in a position to observe the candidate and to assess whether he or she would do a good job on the bench — and judges and lawyers who have worked with or against Coen give him high marks.

Craig Gold is also a deputy district attorney, currently working in the asset forfeiture division of the office. That gives him some experience in civil as well as criminal matters, and that breadth would make him an asset to the court. Still, he does not match Coen in potential.

To get some diversity of background and experience, it would be nice to be able to elect some non-prosecutors to the bench, but only if they have the skills to manage a courtroom. Joe Escalante, radio host, punk rock drummer and bass player, and music impresario as well as attorney, is no doubt the most interesting of this year's judicial candidates, but he offers little evidence to suggest that he's qualified to serve as a judge. Laurence Kaldor provides free legal representation to people who otherwise could not afford counsel, and it's admirable work. But Kaldor lacks sufficient courtroom experience and expertise.

Office 65: Andrea Thompson

In a race among three prosecutors, Thompson is the best choice for judge because she combines her first-rate courtroom skills and years of experience with the impressive air of calm that has made her so effective in an unusual position: She leads the prosecutorial team at Stuart House, where children who have allegedly been sexually abused are cared for — and gently questioned — in the preparation of child-predator and sex-abuse cases. It's an assignment laden with ways for lawyers to harm innocent people, yet Thompson is widely lauded for her treatment of victims and witnesses and for her tenaciousness in ferreting out the truth.

Los Angeles Times Articles