YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Reckless doctors go unchecked

A database that could identify prolific prescribers and prevent overdose deaths is readily available, but California officials say they lack the resources to take advantage of it.

December 30, 2012|By Lisa Girion and Scott Glover, Los Angeles Times
  • Pills collected at death scenes await destruction in a coroner’s property room. Prescription overdoses have fueled a doubling of U.S. drug fatalities in the last decade.
Pills collected at death scenes await destruction in a coroner’s… (Liz. O. Baylen, Los Angeles…)

Kamala Harris has a powerful tool for identifying reckless doctors, but she doesn't use it.

As California's attorney general, Harris controls a database that tracks prescriptions for painkillers and other commonly abused drugs from doctors' offices to pharmacy counters and into patients' hands.

The system, known as CURES, was created so physicians and pharmacists could check to see whether patients were obtaining drugs from multiple providers.

Law enforcement officials and medical regulators could mine the data for a different purpose: To draw a bead on rogue doctors.

But they don't, and that has allowed corrupt or negligent physicians to prescribe narcotics recklessly for years before authorities learned about their conduct through other means, a Times investigation found.

Prescription drug overdoses have increased sharply over the last decade, fueling a doubling of drug fatalities in the U.S. To help stem the loss of life, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that states use prescription data to spot signs of irresponsible prescribing, and at least six states do.

California is not one of them.

By monitoring the flow of prescriptions, authorities can get an early jump on illegal or dangerous conduct by a doctor. Among the telltale signs: writing an inordinate number of prescriptions for addictive medications or for combinations of drugs popular among addicts.

Harris' office keeps CURES off-limits to the public and the news media. But information from a commercial database containing the same kind of data illustrates how valuable CURES could be as an investigative tool.

Private firms purchase prescription data from pharmacies and sell it to drug companies for use in marketing their products. The Times obtained a list from such a database ranking the most prolific prescribers of narcotic painkillers in the Los Angeles area for June 2008.

Of the top 10 doctors on the list, six were eventually convicted of drug dealing or similar crimes or were sanctioned by medical regulators. One of them was a cocaine addict. Some had been prescribing narcotics in high volume for years before authorities caught up with them.

At least 20 of their patients died of overdoses or related causes after taking drugs they prescribed, according to coroners' records.

Had officials been tracking the doctors' prescriptions in CURES, some of those deaths might have been prevented.

Harris, a career prosecutor who was elected attorney general in 2010, declined repeated requests to be interviewed for this article.

Nathan Barankin, her chief of staff, said Harris wants to improve CURES so more doctors can use it to identify drug-seeking patients, and to help prosecutors pursue dealers and other drug offenders.

She has not proposed using CURES to detect signs of excessive prescribing.

Barankin said financial constraints limit the attorney general's options. CURES is "on life support" because of state budget cuts and is barely able to fulfill its primary mission of helping doctors and pharmacists track patients' use of medications, he said.

Even so, the database, as is, could be used to look for signs of improper prescribing. "It certainly has that capacity, as I understand it," Barankin said.

He added, however, that if Harris did begin using CURES to monitor doctors, the state Department of Justice lacks the resources to follow up on leads.

"We don't have the horses or the ability to do that kind of work," he said.

The Medical Board of California, which licenses and oversees physicians, has appealed to the public to report instances of excessive prescribing, a step it took in response to recent Times articles on overdose deaths.

But the board does not use CURES to identify doctors whose prescribing poses a danger to patients.

"We don't have the resources," said executive director Linda K. Whitney.


Dr. Tyron Reece was one physician who would have tripped an alarm early on, if officials had been watching his prescriptions in CURES.

The Inglewood family practitioner ranked fourth among prescribers of oxycodone and hydrocodone in the Los Angeles area in June 2008, according to the commercial database. Reece's customers paid for nearly all those prescriptions in cash, the data show.

The pharmacies that filled Reece's prescriptions were required by law to report them to CURES.

But Reece was not stopped until 2011, and then only because federal authorities investigating a drug smuggling ring stumbled upon evidence that implicated him. Dozens of prescription vials bearing the doctor's name had been found in the trash at a suspect's home.

Confronted by investigators, Reece admitted that he regularly sold prescriptions for cash to patients he had never examined. He pleaded guilty to drug dealing and is awaiting sentencing.

Los Angeles Times Articles