Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsNews

Judge rejects GOP suit aimed at redistricting maps

The legal challenge in federal court alleged that the citizens commission had improperly considered race in creating new districts.

February 10, 2012|By Jean Merl, Los Angeles Times
  • Redistricting Commission members M. Andre Parvenu, left, and Michelle DiGuilio, joined by her sons, sign a resolution on new legislative and congressional maps last August in Sacramento.
Redistricting Commission members M. Andre Parvenu, left, and Michelle… (Rich Pedroncelli / Associated…)

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Republicans seeking to overturn California's new congressional district maps, eliminating one of the last remaining challenges to the work of the citizens commission that drew new political lines for state and congressional offices.

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson on Thursday dismissed the suit brought by former Rep. George Radanovich and four others, who alleged that the commission had improperly considered race in creating the new districts. The suit cited three Los Angeles County districts that were drawn to encourage the election of African American representatives.

The plaintiffs turned to federal court after the California Supreme Court rejected GOP challenges to congressional and state Senate district maps.

"Once again the work of the Citizens Redistricting Commission has been affirmed against baseless partisan attacks," said Jeanne Raya, currently the commission's chair, in a written statement.

"California voters created [the commission] in order to get partisan politics out" of creating new political districts, done every 10 years after the census to adjust for population changes, Raya said. "The federal court has found that the commission's process complied with the law and was fair and representative."

A representative for the plaintiffs did not comment on Friday.

The only remaining challenge to the commission's work is a potential referendum on state Senate districts. Elections officials have until Feb. 24 to determine whether there are enough valid signatures to put the matter before voters in November.

However, the state high court has already ruled that the commission's new districts will be used in this year's elections and will be changed only if voters get a say and reject them.

jean.merl@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|