Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsNews

Romney, Gingrich get testy in Florida

The latest Republican debate offers little new substance but gives the leading candidates an opportunity to sharpen their blows ahead of the state's presidential primary.

January 23, 2012|By Mark Z. Barabak and Seema Mehta, Los Angeles Times
  • Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney, left, and Newt Gingrich wasted little time in trading blows during Saturday's debate in Florida.
Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney, left, and Newt Gingrich… (Emmanuel Dunand, AFP/Getty…)

Reporting from Tampa, Fla. — Standing face to face, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich traded barbs over honesty and integrity in an acrimonious debate that opened a fierce fight ahead of Florida's crucial presidential primary.

After days of hurling insults long-distance and over the airwaves, the two wasted little time engaging in person Monday night, turning the opening exchange into a testy back-and-forth over who was more electable.

"They're not sending somebody to Washington to manage the decay," Gingrich said, reprising a line he has used before to belittle Romney as a passionless Mr. Fix-It. "They're sending somebody to Washington to change it, and that requires somebody who's prepared to be controversial when necessary."

Romney, who was flattened by Gingrich in South Carolina's primary Saturday, displayed the more pugnacious stance that he has adopted since his double-digit loss.

Presenting as a contrast his own experience building a fortune in the business world and helping rescue the 2002 Winter Olympics, Romney said repeatedly that Gingrich had to "resign in disgrace" from his job as House speaker.

"So we have very different perspectives on leadership and the kind of leadership that our conservative movement needs, not just to get elected but to get the country right," Romney said.

A glowering Gingrich countered that Romney's statements were studded with errors, and portrayed his departure as an act of sacrifice to atone for Republicans' disappointing showing in the 1998 congressional election. "I think that's what a leader should do," he said.

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who served with Gingrich at the time, mocked that explanation.

"He didn't have the votes," Paul said. "That was what the problem was. So this idea that he voluntarily resigned and he was going to punish himself because we didn't do well in the election, that's just not the way it was."

The debate, in the city where Republicans will install their presidential nominee in less than eight months, offered little new substance. But in going over well-furrowed ground, the candidates sharpened their attacks, reflecting the role Florida could play in either righting Romney's richly-funded campaign or giving Gingrich the continued momentum he needs to challenge the former Massachusetts governor as the race spins into February and perhaps beyond.

Reflecting the dynamic, it was 15 minutes into the 90-minute session before a question was posed to a candidate other than Romney or Gingrich. Along with Paul, they were joined onstage by former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania.

As part of his newly aggressive posture, Romney brought up an old issue: the work Gingrich did for Freddie Mac, the federally backed mortgage guarantor, which many Republicans blame for the housing meltdown. The attack could have particular resonance in Florida, where the real estate and construction industries, two mainstays of the economy, were flattened by the foreclosure crisis and housing tracts lay abandoned.

Gingrich's consulting firm was paid more than $1.6 million by the mortgage giant — not to lobby, he adamantly insists, but to lend his perspective as "a historian." Romney scoffed at that assertion.

"They don't pay people $25,000 a month for six years as historians," he said. Later, he brought up Gingrich's work for healthcare companies. "I call it influence peddling," Romney said. "It is not right."

Gingrich had insisted early on that he would not spend the evening "trying to chase Gov. Romney's misinformation." But after visibly trying to keep his emotions in check, Gingrich boiled over. He said the debate had become "unnecessarily personal and nasty" and called Romney's claim that he lobbied "defamatory and factually false."

In a preemptive move shortly before the debate, Gingrich's former consulting company released a copy of its 2006 contract with Freddie Mac. The document offered scant detail; just a single paragraph described the "scope of services and fees," saying Gingrich's firm was paid $25,000 a month but offering no explanation of the work that was done.

When moderator Brian Williams of NBC asked why there was not a more complete accounting, Gingrich said confidentiality issues needed to be resolved.

Facing questions about his own transparency, Romney announced after losing South Carolina that on Tuesday he would release his 2010 tax return and an estimate for 2011, ending several weeks of equivocating.

The Washington Post, offered a view of the returns by the campaign, reported after the debate that Romney claimed income of $21.7 million in 2010 and estimated $20.9 million in income in 2011. Almost all came from profits, dividends or interest from investments. His effective tax rate was less than 14% in 2010, the paper said, and just over 15% last year.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|