Advertisement

London Olympics review: Danny Boyle delivers theatrical spectacle

The director delivered opening ceremonies for the Olympics that celebrated both the eccentricity and enlightenment that are fascinatingly entwined in Britain's cultural DNA.

July 28, 2012|By Charles McNulty | Losa Angeles Times Theater Critic
  • Performers depict a scene in tribute of The Great Ormond Street Hospital for sick children and the NHS during the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games at the Olympic Stadium on Friday.
Performers depict a scene in tribute of The Great Ormond Street Hospital… (Michael Regan/Getty Images )

Olympic opening ceremonies tend to be orgies of nationalistic sentiment, choreographed with the propagandizing artistry of a Las Vegas-styled Leni Riefenstahl.
 
 “Marvel at our unparalleled history,” said the Greeks at the 2004 games in Athens. “Stand in awe of our multitudinous might,” said the Chinese at the 2008 competition in Beijing.
 
The British pageant had to tread more carefully given the country’s imperial history and modern self-consciousness. Too much muscle-flexing in this post-colonial era wouldn’t have advanced Britain’s 21st century image as a deluxe global marketplace, welcoming to all who have the financial wherewithal to get past security.

PHOTOS: London Olympics opening ceremony

Director Danny Boyle, best known for his films “Trainspotting” and “Slumdog Millionaire” and still winning accolades for his mesmerizing National Theatre of Great Britain stage production of “Frankenstein,” delivered an opening spectacle for the 2012 Olympics that celebrated both the eccentricity and enlightenment that are fascinatingly entwined in Britain's cultural DNA.

Centuries of jingoistic flag-planting were whitewashed but there was a sharp focus on the individual even as fictional characters did their best to steal the show.
 
The theatrical expectations were higher than usual. London is a world capital of theater—some might say the world capital of theater—thanks to its long tradition of passionate playgoing and governmental arts subsidy. Armchair critics, totaling about 1 billion worldwide, might have taken issue with the degree of muddle, which lent the production an air of arty disorder that the Chinese wouldn’t have tolerated.
 
Certainly on a visual level it wasn’t as awe-inspiring as Beijing, where even the weather was kept under state control. But what distinguished “Isles of Wonder,” as the opening ceremony was titled, was the way history was given human lineaments.

A tale of the country’s journey from rural innocence to industrial guilt to digital giddiness was related in the manner of the world’s most elaborate pop-up book, yet the faces of the masses are what left the deepest impression.

This wasn’t the occasion to reflect on actual horror. The commemoration of the fallen from World War I was tasteful, aesthetically tearful, unreal.
 
But the plight of workers slaving away in soot and sweat was spotlighted. Societal progress, if you can call it that, is backbreaking, entailing the sacrifice of generations made up of people who look an awful lot like you and me. Boyle wasn’t afraid to impart moments of stillness amid all the percussive chaos to connect us to our forgotten predecessors.

A tribute to Britain’s National Health Service must have seemed extremely curious to an American viewership conditioned to think of healthcare as a political wedge issue instead of a basic human right. But there was little time for earnestness.

The children’s hospital setting transformed into a world of storybook enchantment, with Captain Hook, Mary Poppins and Lord Voldemort from the “Harry Potter” franchise swooping in and apparently spoiling for war.

Transitions between whimsical sequences left NBC’s often baffled Matt Lauer and Meredith Vieira debating whether some of the sights were “cute or creepy.” (In fairness, they had every reason to be confused.) But the orchestral waterfall and expressive lighting worked hard to keep an audience in an awakened state of dreamland, where logic is held happily in abeyance and a monster can easily be mistaken for an old friend.
 
Aristotle in the “Poetics” informs us that spectacle and song are the least important elements of good tragedy. For Olympic opening ceremonies, however, they take priority over his all-important plot.  Narrative just has a hard time getting heard above the din, and it's too bad the social media romantic saga of Boyle's production wasn’t ditched.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|