Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsFamilies
(Page 2 of 2)

Dad and dad vs. mom and dad

Op-Ed

The claims Mark Regnerus makes about his findings on gay parenting play into a pattern of conservative scholars and activists misinterpreting the data on LGBT families.

June 13, 2012|By Nathaniel Frank

There is a larger point, however, that can be lost in the debate over how to read the data. There is no basis in the recent history of American social policy for testing the parenting skills of a class of citizens before we grant them permission to parent — or to marry. Given all the research on the hardships of children raised by single parents, there is still no movement to preemptively remove kids from broken homes after every divorce or to ban single people from having kids; such policies would be patently inhumane and unenforceable. Growing up in poverty increases the risk of a wide range of social and psychological ills, yet since the craze for eugenics died down, no one is proposing banning poor people from marriage or child rearing. And some ethnic and racial groups are statistically less likely to get or stay married, yet there is no ethnic litmus test for marriage or parenting — only a gay one.

With the Supreme Court poised to look closely at this very question — whether the state has a compelling interest (such as child welfare) in limiting marriage to heterosexuals — this research and how it's interpreted matters. Not because gay people should have to pass some special test to marry or protect their families, but so those with an anti-gay agenda can't deprive children of such protections under the banner of helping them.

Nathaniel Frank, a visiting scholar at Columbia's Center for Gender and Sexuality Law, is writing a book called "The Anti-Gay Mind."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|