YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

How 'Angels in America' changed the national conversation

Tony Kushner's sprawling play, introduced in the early 1990s, touched on all manner of concerns. It altered the way people thought about AIDS — and much more.

November 10, 2012|By Mary McNamara, Los Angeles Times Senior Culture Editor
  • Volunteers walk on the 21,000-panel Names Project AIDS Memorial Quilt in Washington on Oct. 10, 1992.
Volunteers walk on the 21,000-panel Names Project AIDS Memorial Quilt… (Shayna Brenna, Associated…)

Queen Elizabeth called 1992 her annus horribilis. Bill Clinton defeated President George H.W. Bush and ended the Reagan era. Pope John Paul II lifted the Edict of Inquisition against Galileo, and the Toronto Blue Jays became the first non-American team to win the World Series. In April, a Simi Valley jury found four LAPD officers not guilty in the beating of Rodney King and Los Angeles exploded. In August, Pat Buchanan rocked the Republican convention with his infamous "God's country" speech ("better in the original German," observed columnist Molly Ivins).

Arching over the sociopolitical upheaval was the AIDS epidemic. By 1992, more than 1 million Americans were infected with HIV, and AIDS had killed close to 150,000 people, including Rock Hudson, Alvin Ailey, Robert Mapplethorpe, Isaac Asimov, Perry Ellis, Liberace, Michel Foucault and Ryan White. There was no cure or effective treatment in sight.

"Angels in America": A Nov. 11 Critic's Notebook about the legacy of the play "Angels in America" 20 years later misspelled former Times editor Richard Rouillard's last name as Rouille. —

Then, on Nov. 8, in a city still rebuilding from days of violent riots, "Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes" opened at the Mark Taper Forum. There had been successful plays and films that positively depicted gay lives — "Torch Song Trilogy," "La Cage aux Folles" — and later the devastation of AIDS with "The Normal Heart" and "Longtime Companion," but nothing like "Angels in America," which put AIDS into such heaving, glorious context that it finally and irrevocably became part of the national narrative.

GRAPHIC: Memories of 'Angels in America'

"AIDS made it impossible not to talk about gayness," says David Ehrenstein, a gay activist and author. "The grave wasn't even a closet anymore. 'Angels in America' tied it into the huge arc of the American story; the gay community was no longer an isolated group. We needed a big play about this, and he gave us an epic — it was Brecht, it was Wagner. It was amazing."

Theater is one way, one important way, we tell each other the stories of ourselves. Good theater deals in specifics that resonate with many, and it's difficult to think of another play that told a story with such painful specificity and vast resonance. In "Angels in America" playwright Tony Kushner meticulously detailed the ghastly physical effects of AIDS and then shook his story so hard it unfurled to the edges of the universe — deep into history, high into the heavens.

Ehrenstein saw "Angels" with a group of friends in one go, a matinee performance of Part 1, "Millennium Approaches," then an evening performance of Part 2, "Perestroika."

"It was the only way to see it," he says. "How could you stand to wait for the second part?"

Many early fans, including actor Alan Mandell, had waited two years to see the second part. In 1990, a friend persuaded him to see "Millennium Approaches" when it was in workshop at the Taper, Too. The Times' theater critic, Sylvie Drake, had been less than effusive; though she admired the ambition of the work, she felt it was over-long. The result was a less-than-sold-out house.


"[My friend] told me it was long, but it was worth it," Mandell says now. "It was 31/2 hours, but it felt like 30 minutes. I remember after it was over, we just sat there, though we had been sitting for a very long time. We were just stunned by what we had seen. I would have sat through it again. That night."

Instead Mandell, former consulting director at Los Angeles Theatre Center and general manager of the Repertory Theatre of Lincoln Center, got on the phone, calling actors, writers and anyone he could think of, telling them to see this play. "I don't usually call people," he says with a laugh. "But I told people I would buy their tickets if they would just go. I just couldn't believe the scope of it — I had never seen a play about Mormons, and to put [Joseph McCarthy protégé] Roy Cohn in and make it so compelling. It was unbelievable."

New York playwright and Oscar winner Mayo Simon, then living in Los Angeles, got one of those calls. "I asked Alan what it was about," he says now. "And he said, 'everything.'"

As Kushner finished the second half, "Millennium Approaches" went to London, where it became a bona fide hit. Presenting at the 1992 Tony Awards, Ian McKellen told audiences that when it came back to America, it would win every Tony there was. Simon went to the Taper and realized Mandell had been right.

"It was about the Jewish experience, the gay experience, McCarthyism, the Mormon experience. It was exploring a whole world of politics, feelings, religion. And it was about the AIDS experience, which was enormous and enormously scary — like a biblical plague. And," he adds, "civic trumpets here, we all felt we were seeing it first."

GRAPHIC: Memories of 'Angels in America'

Los Angeles Times Articles