Advertisement
(Page 2 of 2)

THE NATION

Anti-terror data centers criticized

The facilities threaten civil liberties and do little for security, Senate panel says.

October 03, 2012|Ken Dilanian and Brian Bennett

In some cases, the investigation found, fusion centers have also made embarrassing intelligence errors. Last year, for example, the Illinois Statewide Terrorism and Intelligence Center in Springfield published a report asserting that a hacker in Russia had stolen an unknown number of user names and passwords to sensitive utility control systems and used that information to break into a local water district's computerized control system.

In fact, the "hacker" was a utility employee who had accessed the system legitimately while on a family vacation, the report found.

A spokeswoman for the center, Monique Bond, would not comment on the report, but said, "Fusion centers and the information shared by local, state and federal agencies enhances law enforcement's efforts in fighting everyday crime and homeland defense."

The subcommittee report also pointed to fusion center reports on activities protected by the U.S. Constitution.

One draft intelligence report examined a reading list from a Muslim community group: "Ten Book Recommendations for Every Muslim." Four were written by individuals with records in a U.S. intelligence counter-terrorism database, the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, known as TIDE.

For The Record
Los Angeles Times Saturday, October 06, 2012 Home Edition Main News Part A Page 4 News Desk 2 inches; 78 words Type of Material: Correction
Intelligence centers: An article in the Oct. 3 Section A about a Senate report that was critical of federally funded intelligence centers said that the Joint Regional Intelligence Center in Norwalk had shared information about literature found in the back seat of a car during a traffic stop. The article described the material as "Muslim extremist literature," attributing the description to Michael Downing of the Los Angeles Police Department. Downing had described the material as "violent extremist literature."

"We cannot report on books and other writings of TIDE matches simply because they are TIDE matches," wrote a Homeland Security reviewer of the draft report. "The writings themselves are protected by the 1st Amendment unless you can establish that something in the writing indicates planning or advocates violent or other criminal activity." The report was not published.

--

ken.dilanian@latimes.com

brian.bennett@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|