YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Libya official says militia commander led raid on U.S. mission

Government-allied militias say they have not been told to arrest the man, identified as Ahmed Abu Khattala, in the Benghazi attack. It is unclear where he is.

October 17, 2012|By Shashank Bengali and Richard A. Serrano, Los Angeles Times
  • In Benghazi, Libya, the headquarters of Ansar al Sharia, an Islamist militia and social organization, was targeted in popular protests against the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission.
In Benghazi, Libya, the headquarters of Ansar al Sharia, an Islamist militia… (Abdullah Doma / AFP/Getty…)

BENGHAZI, Libya — The militia commander who led the deadly raid on the U.S. mission in Benghazi is an Islamist and former political prisoner whose fighters were also blamed for assassinating a senior military officer after he defected to the opposition during last year's revolution against Moammar Kadafi, a senior Libyan official said.

FBI agents have been shown a cellphone picture of the commander at the scene of the attack, according to Libyans familiar with the investigation. But it is unclear where the man, identified as Ahmed Abu Khattala, is now, and militias loyal to the government say they have received no orders to arrest him or any other suspect in connection with the attack.

In a contentious exchange with Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney on Tuesday night, President Obama reiterated his pledge to bring the attackers to justice. But the chaos in Libya after the fall of Kadafi creates daunting obstacles.

With the army and police forces yet to be rebuilt, the government depends on a patchwork of militias to maintain security. Although many of the largest armed groups are allied with the government, authorities are reluctant to order a local militia to move against the attackers for fear of inflaming rivalries — or having their orders refused.

Sending in a militia from 400 miles away in Tripoli risks exacerbating tension between Libya's eastern and western regions. And even though Libya's weak central government is pro-American, unilateral U.S. military action would invite a backlash.

A senior Libyan official on Wednesday identified the commander in the cellphone photo taken by a witness to the attack as Abu Khattala, who founded a militia of former prisoners called the Abu Obeida brigade. That group was blamed for the assassination of Gen. Abdul Fatah Younis, Kadafi's former interior minister, who defected to the rebels and had become one of their senior military commanders.

The killing of Younis in eastern Libya in July 2011 was an indication of division  within rebel ranks and a harbinger of the disarray still plaguing the country. No one was charged in his death, but Libyans speculated that Abu Khattala could have ordered it as retribution for his treatment while in Kadafi's infamous Abu Salim prison.

"He is the one who is responsible" for leading attackers on the U.S. mission, said the Libyan official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in discussing the ongoing investigation.

Some experts believe the Abu Obeida brigade is now part of Ansar al Sharia, an Islamist militia and social organization that disappeared from Benghazi after it was targeted in popular protests against the attack. U.S. officials reportedly intercepted communications from members of Ansar al Sharia bragging about the attack to Al Qaeda affiliates in North Africa.

"All of these rogue Islamist brigades swim in the same small pool" in Libya, said Frederic Wehrey, an expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington.

Abu Khattala's whereabouts was unknown, but the Libyan official said he's probably still in Benghazi — where his poor Laythi neighborhood has earned the moniker "Little Kandahar" — or elsewhere in eastern Libya.

"It's not whether they want to bring them to justice, but whether they can," an international official in Libya said of the government. The official did not want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.

The official's mission was attacked by militants this year, one of a number of security incidents involving foreigners across Libya. But Libyan authorities didn't investigate the attacks — and the mission didn't expect it to do so.

"They don't have the power. They depend for their own security on the brigades," the official said. "At the same time, the brigades don't want to give up their weapons because they don't trust the government."

U.S. officials also described a perfunctory investigation of an incident at the U.S. mission in Benghazi five months earlier, when a crude bomb was detonated within its walls. No one was injured, and the damage was minor.

Despite U.S. pressure to find those responsible, experts said Libyans would prefer to punish the attackers in their own time and on their own terms.

"They will be held accountable, but not in terms that Americans might expect," said Brian McQuinn, an Oxford University scholar who has spent several months in Libya researching armed groups. Tribal elders could engage in protracted negotiations to determine the fate of the suspects.

"To go in with a huge force — other brigades would be offended. They'll say, 'Who are these people coming into Benghazi?'" McQuinn said. "They have to develop legitimacy and have to be invited in."

Los Angeles Times Articles