Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsNews

White House suspects Syria used chemical weapons, seeks inquiry

A senior official says the U.S. is still evaluating the evidence that indicates sarin gas was used. Some in Congress say a 'red line' has been crossed.

April 25, 2013|By David S. Cloud and Shashank Bengali, Los Angeles Times
  • Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks with reporters in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, after reading a statement on the U.S. allegations of chemical weapons use in Syria.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks with reporters in Abu Dhabi, United… (Jim Watson, Pool Photo )

WASHINGTON — The White House said for the first time that there was evidence Syria had used chemical weapons in its civil war, but administration officials called for a broader United Nations investigation and edged away from declaring Damascus had crossed a "red line" that might trigger U.S. intervention.

According to a White House letter to Congress, U.S. intelligence agencies assessed "with varying degrees of confidence" that President Bashar Assad's forces had used small amounts of sarin gas, a deadly nerve agent banned by international treaty.

The finding was based in part on analysis of "physiological samples," apparently referring to hair and blood from victims.

President Obama publicly warned Syria last year that use or transfer to terrorists of lethal chemical agents would prompt an unspecified U.S. response.

As recently as March 21, Obama said: "I've made it clear to Bashar al-Assad and all who follow his orders: We will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people, or the transfer of those weapons to terrorists. The world is watching; we will hold you accountable."

But a senior White House official said Thursday that the administration was still evaluating the evidence. The official said uncertainties in the intelligence, including whether anyone tampered with the samples, do not provide absolute assurance that Syria used the poison gas.

Sarin symptoms

People exposed to odorless, colorless and tasteless sarin by contaminated air, food, water or surfaces may experience some or all of the following symptoms:

Head: Excessive sweating, confusion, drowsiness, headache, loss of consciousness Eyes: Watery eyes, pinpoint pupils, eye pain, blurred vision Nose: Runny nose Mouth: Drooling, coughing Chest: Tightness, rapid breathing, respiratory failure Heart: Slow or fast heart rate, low or high blood pressure Stomach: Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain Groin: Increased urination, diarrhea Legs: Weakness, paralysis, convulsions

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Graphics reporting by Brady MacDonald

"We believe it's necessary to continue to investigate — to corroborate that information and to have a strong, firm evidentiary basis … as to whether or not the red line has been crossed and to inform our decision-making about what to do next," the official said.

The official refused to say where or when U.S. intelligence had obtained the samples. But they apparently were not gathered by U.S. personnel in the war zone.

"The chain of custody is not clear, so we cannot confirm how the exposure occurred and under what conditions," said the official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.

Still, the announcement marked a shift for the administration, which said Wednesday that it had not yet determined if evidence supported allegations by Britain, France and Israel of possible gas attacks in Syria.

Rebel groups and the Assad government have traded accusations about three alleged uses of poison gas: in Homs in December, and in Aleppo and outside Damascus, Syria's two largest cities, in March.

Videos released by both sides purported to show dead farm animals and people struggling to breathe, but the authenticity of the footage could not be verified.

The U.S. caution reflects deep concern at the White House about being drawn militarily into the 2-year-old conflict, which has killed an estimated 70,000 people, created more than 1 million refugees and shown no sign of abating.

By insisting on proof beyond what the CIA and other U.S. agencies can provide, the administration sought to draw a clear contrast with President George W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003. At the time, the White House cited U.S. intelligence reports about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that proved wildly inaccurate.

"We have seen very bad movies before, when intelligence is perceived to have driven policy decisions that in the cold light of day have proven wrong," said a senior U.S. defense official.

But Obama risks appearing as though he is seeking an excuse to stay on the sidelines. Critics say the White House should do more to stop Syrian use of unconventional weapons and to safeguard U.S. interests in the Middle East as radical fighters take a larger role in the insurgency.

Some senior Democrats called Thursday for stronger action.

"It is clear that red lines have been crossed and action must be taken to prevent larger-scale use," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), head of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "The world must come together to prevent this by unified action which results in the secure containment of Syria's significant stockpile of chemical weapons."

Republicans expressed doubts about turning to the United Nations.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|