YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


Inheritance was no gift for schoolteacher

Financial mistakes tied to her mother's house led to bankruptcy, but the ordeal has taught Jane Osick valuable lessons.

June 22, 2013|By Minh Dang, Los Angeles Times
  • Jane Osick, who teaches at a private school in Pasadena, declared bankruptcy after racking up $120,000 in credit card debt. Now, with new financial purpose, she has built up a six-month emergency fund even with a bankruptcy obligation of $525 a month.
Jane Osick, who teaches at a private school in Pasadena, declared bankruptcy… (Gary Friedman / Los Angeles…)

The trouble started with the inheritance.

Eight years ago, the economy was booming and Jane Osick was on solid ground. She had manageable student loans, a stable job and excellent credit.

Then, in less than two years, she racked up $120,000 in credit card debt.

How did a sensible schoolteacher dig such a hole? Blame it on the inheritance — a house she helped refinance when her mother was ailing and then remodeled after her mother died.

"Looking back, what I should have done was stay out of it," said Osick, 48. "We should have let her lose the house, because what difference would it have made? She could have come live with me."

Instead, with her mother's health and finances failing, she and her sister refinanced the San Diego County house and put the mortgage under their names. After her mother died in 2006, Osick and her sister remodeled the house to sell. Everything needed replacing: the 1980s kitchen and 1960s bathrooms; the 25-year-old carpet, windows and doors; the rotted deck.

Osick juggled nearly a dozen low-interest cards to finance the project, but the rates ballooned along with the balances. Panicked but hoping to hang on, she gave up her Pasadena apartment, shed her stuff and moved in with a friend for a time.

Just as the remodel was finished, the market tanked and buyers disappeared. Osick found renters, but soon they stopped paying. The house ended up in a short sale and she in Bankruptcy Court.

It's often an illness or extraordinary event that pushes people into bankruptcy, said certified financial planner Jennifer Hartman of Greenleaf Financial Group in Los Angeles. "Everyone thinks, 'Oh, they just went out and spent too much,' but that's really not the majority of people in bankruptcy."

Three years into a five-year debt repayment plan, Osick is looking to the future with new financial purpose. Before, she lived within her means but never found extra for savings; now, even with a bankruptcy obligation of $525 a month, she has built up a six-month emergency fund.

This is the bankruptcy system working as it should. Not only has Chapter 13 made her debt repayment manageable, but it also has snapped her to financial attention.

But where to go from here?

Feeling vulnerable and adrift, Osick craves the stability of owning a condo. She also would like to replace her 2000 Camry that was destroyed in a 2011 windstorm.

Then there's the matter of retirement.

"I usually say if you can't afford to save for retirement, you can't afford to buy a home," Hartman said.

Osick earns $69,000 a year teaching English and French full time at a private high school and grading standardized tests on the side; last year, she read more than 10,000 essays. In her previous life, Osick didn't think she had extra for retirement savings, but her experience in bankruptcy has taught her otherwise.

The first thing Osick should do, Hartman said, is sign up for her school's 403(b) plan, which offers a matching amount for the first 5.25% of her salary that she contributes.

"You've got free money you're not taking," Hartman said. "At the minimum, take the free money."

Next, Osick should start building up her Roth IRA, currently in a Merrill Lynch account she opened with little thought; she doesn't even know how the money is invested.

Hartman recommended Osick roll over the $900 balance to a Vanguard account and set up automatic contributions.

"Vanguard's nice because they're low-fee. If you do what's called a target-date fund … they grow more conservative as you get older. They're taking all the investment decisions out of it," Hartman said.

Any amount Osick sets aside will be a great help in retirement. She has a pension that promises $2,052 a month if she continues working until age 65. In addition, at age 67, she can start collecting about $2,089 a month in Social Security; if she waits until age 70, that amount jumps to about $2,618.

Because Osick already lives rather frugally, Hartman warns that her expenses probably won't go down in retirement; in fact, they're likely to go up as healthcare costs rise. So Osick should aim to have 100% to 120% income replacement in retirement.

"My general rule is that if you start in your 20s and you save 10% [of your salary each year], you're fine. Problem is, how many people do?" Hartman said.

Most people start saving much later, in which case they need to set aside more. "Everybody thinks life's going to get easier. It doesn't. It just gets more expensive."

Osick's desire to buy a condo is a case in point.

"Your expenses would go up dramatically," Hartman said.

Osick doesn't hanker for the trappings (and headaches) of owning a house, but a condo would give her a sense of security.

"If I had family that I could rely on … I would probably just continue to rent," she said. "But it really is down to just me, and that's scary."

Los Angeles Times Articles