Advertisement

Immigration reform bill heads to full Senate

May 21, 2013|By Lisa Mascaro and Brian Bennett
  • Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) left, confers with Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Monday.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) left, confers… (J. Scott Applewhite, Associated…)

WASHINGTON — A sweeping bipartisan plan to overhaul the nation’s immigration system headed to the Senate floor after a key committee approved it Tuesday, but not before tilting the bill to the political right with amendments designed to attract more Republican support.

The centerpiece of the legislation — a 13-year path to citizenship for many of the 11 million people now without legal status — survived intact, setting the stage for what could be the biggest victory in a generation for advocates of immigrant rights.

The vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee was 13-5, boosted by a last-minute deal to increase access to high-tech visas.  That change won the support of a Republican senator beyond the two on the committee who had helped draft the bill. All Democrats voted in favor.

Foes of legalizing immigrants already in the country, once the most prominent voices in the immigration debate, are largely losing that battle, as many Republicans decided early on to embrace reform. The issue is key for Latino and minority voters who abandoned the GOP in the last election,  and party leaders believe their support of the overhaul will begin to level the field.

“I'm hopeful that we'll be able to get a bill that we can pass here in the Senate,” said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican minority leader.

As the Senate committee blazed through the last of 300 amendments Tuesday,  President Obama was meeting with young people from immigrant families at the White House. Immigration overhaul is the administration’s top second-term priority.

The bill, drafted by four Democrats and four Republicans, would be the most substantial change in immigration law since the 1986 reform under President Reagan, which gave legal status to 3 million people who were in the country unlawfully.

Now the bill heads to the full Senate in June. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has vowed to make the legislation the chamber’s priority in a bid to give it some momentum as the House, which is controlled by Republicans, pursues a separate path.

What began a month ago as a 844-page bill includes a complicated series of political trade-offs that have required compromises from both sides of the aisle.

The path to citizenship for people who entered the country illegally or overstayed visas would be available to those who came forward, gained provisional status and continued working. They would also have to pay back taxes, fees and fines  and learn English. They could gain permanent legal status with a green card in 10 years and apply for citizenship in 13. The process is half as long for agricultural workers who commit to jobs in the fields and adults who were brought to the country as minors but serve in the military or attend college.

In return, the legislation would provide $4.5 billion for increased border security, including drones and border patrols. A new low-skilled guest worker program would be created for maids, landscapers and others who could enter the country for three-year stints. All employers would be required, within five years, to verify the legal status of their workers.

Many audience members at the five lengthy hearings over the last three weeks have been young adults brought to the U.S. as children. Known as Dreamers after the Dream Act, federal legislation that would give them legal status, they frequently tell compelling stories of their lives in the shadows. 

 “It is really hard to sit there and hear all these people debate your life,” said Renata Teodoro, 25, who was in the hallway outside the hearing room Tuesday, stopping senators and lobbying them. When she was 6 years old, she walked across the Sonora Desert into California with her mother, Gorete. Her mother was arrested by immigration agents in 2007 and deported to Brazil. The two have been apart ever since.

As the committee debated changes to the bill these past weeks, Teodoro sometimes sat in the hearing room wearing a white T-shirt printed with a photo of her and her mom.

“Some of the other senators say really horrible things,” said Teodoro, who grew up in Boston and was granted a legal work permit in March under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program launched by the Obama administration last year. “For all of us, we tense up. It’s a really tense atmosphere.”

During the debate over the bill, major changes proposed by opponents were thwarted, but others were accepted, threatening the delicate balance reached by the eight senators.

Lining up conservative support, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a potential presidential hopeful  whose work in the bipartisan group gave the bill a push, promised a fight for tougher border security provisions, a warning shot that encouraged the committee to move the bill to the political right.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|