YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Afghanistan: Karzai baffles, frustrates as he rejects advice

November 25, 2013|By David Zucchino
  • One day after a loya jirga meeting ended in Kabul, Afghanistan, Said Kamal, 26, left, and Sayed Mujtaba, 30, right, agreed Monday that President Hamid Karzai should sign a security agreement with the United States.
One day after a loya jirga meeting ended in Kabul, Afghanistan, Said Kamal,… (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles…)

KABUL, Afghanistan — From presidential candidates to grocers and spice merchants, many Afghans threw up their hands in frustration and exasperation with their elected president on Monday. They had watched Hamid Karzai on TV the day before, and many were baffled by what they saw.

Karzai had brusquely rejected the recommendations of a special grand council he had personally convened to vote on whether Afghanistan should sign a security agreement with the United States. After the council, or loya jirga, enthusiastically endorsed the pact, Karzai refused to sign and launched an angry diatribe against the United States. It ended in a tense face-off with the elderly loya jirga chairman, who supports the deal.

It was a remarkably emotional and erratic display, even by a president notorious for unpredictability and volatility. It came after Karzai’s appointed loya jirga delegates pleaded with him to sign before a year’s-end deadline imposed by the United States.

"It was the first time he lost his composure in front of the nation," Atiqullah Baryalai, Karzai’s former deputy defense minister, said in an interview at his Kabul compound. "He is now marginalized from his own people."

Karzai’s defiance has corroded his relations with the United States and with many of his own citizens. His rambling comments alienated some Afghans, who said they were perplexed, for instance, by his vague new demand that the U.S. somehow guarantee peace in this war-ravaged nation.

"This president — I don’t have any idea what he’s doing," Azrakhsh Hafizi, a loya jirga committee chairman who is also directs the Afghanistan International Chamber of Commerce in Kabul, said in an interview. "Presidents come and go, but the people are the owners of this country. He should listen to them."

A single question dominated conversations with bewildered Afghans on Monday: Why would Karzai insist on convening a loya jirga of prominent citizens from around the country, then so cavalierly brush them off when he didn’t like what they told him?

"You could just see the discomfort and confusion in the loya jirga when the president spoke," said Farkhunda Zahra Naderi, a member of parliament, said in an interview. "These are people with influence and power. They reflect the will of the Afghan people, but their decision was ignored."

Virtually all 50 loya jirga committees recommended not only signing the 10-year agreement, but doing so before the end of the year. Karzai insists on waiting until after the Afghan presidential election in April.

The loya jirga is an advisory body, but the councils have a long and respected tradition as a democratic means of gauging public opinion on matters of surpassing national interest. Karzai had indicated he would abide by the council’s recommendations.

Instead, his address infuriated many Afghans, as well as the United States. He angrily accused U.S. soldiers of raiding Afghan homes and killing civilians. He rebuked the loya jirga and refused to sign the security deal even after agreeing with the U.S. last week on the text of the 24-page pact.

"Really, it’s like he’s losing control of his mind," former defense official Baryalai said. "He makes new problems for himself every day."

Of Karzai’s demand that the U.S. somehow secure peace in Afghanistan before he’ll sign the agreement, Baryalai added: "I have no idea what that means. Nobody does."

Sayed Mujtaba, 30, a grocer, said, "The president thinks he knows what’s good for the people, but the people have already said through the loya jirga they want this agreement." Mujtaba wants Karzai to sign now to avoid a cutoff of U.S. military support and development aid.

Mohammed Haroon, 23, who runs a spice shop, spoke for many small businessmen who fear the country’s economy cannot survive without billions of dollars in U.S. and international aid. The World Bank office in Kabul, in a report last month, called Afghanistan’s economy "highly aid dependent" and said uncertainty over post-2014 security is battering the fragile economy.

"If the foreigners leave next year," Harroon said, referring to U.S. and international combat troops, "then the next day, the Taliban will be back and taking over."

The absence of a post-2014 U.S. force here could plunge the country back into civil war, warned Said Kamal, 26, a grocery shopper. "Karzai needs to sign for the country’s security — and now," he said.

Ghulam Nabi, 30, a baker, fears Karzai is putting the entire nation at risk for his own political ambitions. "He cares about his own political career, and also avoiding any blame" for cutting a deal with the United States, Nabi said.

Karzai’s performance has rattled political allies and the military, according to some Afghan politicians. Naderi said there is confusion and uncertainty within Karzai’s political team, with certain advisors providing "some very bad advice."

Los Angeles Times Articles