Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsLakers

PRO BASKETBALL

Jeanie Buss says she was 'stunned' Jim Buss didn't hire Phil Jackson

In memoir, Lakers executive Jeanie Buss recounts an episode in which her brother Jim hired Mike D'Antoni as coach rather than Phil Jackson, her fiance.

September 22, 2013|Times staff
  • In her updated memoir, "Laker Girl," Lakers executive Jeanie Buss says she was 'devastated' after her brother, Jim Buss, right, decided he wouldn't hire Phil Jackson to replace the fired Mike Brown as coach.
In her updated memoir, "Laker Girl," Lakers executive Jeanie… (Anne Cusack / Los Angeles…)

In Jeanie Buss' updated memoir "Laker Girl," written with former Times sportswriter Steve Springer and published by Triumph Books, she writes about the firing of Lakers Coach Mike Brown last November.

In this excerpt Buss, head of the team's business operations, describes the whirlwind weekend after Brown's firing when her fiance, former Lakers Coach Phil Jackson, talked to the front office about returning as coach. Ultimately, her brother Jim Buss, head of player personnel; General Manager Mitch Kupchak, and her late father and Lakers owner, Jerry Buss, decided to hire Mike D'Antoni instead of Jackson.

I first heard the rumors on radio. Then, my brother called to tell me it was official. Mike Brown was out.

"I support you in whatever decision you make," I told Jim. "I understand."

That's all I said to him.

Phil called me from the gym after he saw the news on ESPN. "That's not right," he said. "It's not enough time for a coach. I don't care who it is. You don't fire a coach five games in." . . .

[That Friday afternoon] My brother walked into my private office a little while later and got right to the point.

"I feel really bad that I made this mistake in hiring Mike Brown," he said. "I've cost the family money. But I had to let him go and we are going to have to continue to pay that contract. What I want to know from you is, do you think Phil and I could work together?"

My brother really caught me off guard with that question.

"I have no idea if Phil is even interested in coming back," I said. "If you want to discuss it, Jim, it has to be between you and him. I can't be in the middle. The only way it's going to work is if I'm not involved." . . .

My brother's response was to repeat his initial question: "Do you think Phil and I can work together?"

"Jim, just look at your past success," I replied. "Andrew Bynum is a perfect example. You brought Phil a piece of raw talent and Phil helped develop him into what he became. He was one of the top two centers in the league. Of course you and Phil can work together."

That was my only input. I wasn't pushing for him to get the job. I really wasn't.

"Can you give me Phil's number?" Jim asked.

"Here's the cell number," I said. "Here's the home number. Do whatever makes you comfortable."

We went on to talk about basketball for the first time ever in that meeting. In the past, that subject was limited to Jim and my dad. They didn't really need me.

"I want to work closer with you," Jim said. "Our communication needs to be better." . . .

The next morning, my brother called Phil and asked, "Can we talk?"

"Yes," replied Phil, "but I don't want to come to the office because I think it's better to keep this quiet."

He invited Jim to his house, a place my brother had never visited before.

They agreed to meet at 11:00 AM that Saturday. Half an hour later, Jim called back to ask, "Do you mind if Mitch comes with me?"

"Of course not," replied Phil, who had a good working relationship with Mitch.

Still, Mitch's presence changed the dynamics of the meeting because Phil would be there alone, without his agent. The get-together was supposed to be a conversation, not a negotiation.

I vacated the property, taking my dog for a ride so my brother, Mitch, and Phil could have their time together.

At 12:30, Phil called to say Jim and Mitch had just left.

"How'd it go?" I asked upon arriving home.

"We had a great meeting," said Phil. "We went over each player and the issues I see with the team."

Phil told my brother and Mitch that he would want to have input on personnel decisions if and when there were roster changes. The last time he came back to the Lakers, he had input at the beginning, but during the last season or two he was there, Phil was kept out of the decision-making process.

There was no discussion of money at the meeting or any of the supposed demands by Phil that were later erroneously reported in the media.

Looking back, I wonder where the media was getting its information. Someone was talking.

As Jim and Mitch were preparing to leave, Phil got in the last word, telling them, "I'm going to consider this but I have to check with some people," meaning he had to get cleared by his doctors and talk to his family.

This could be a life-changing decision. He wasn't going to just say, "Okay, where's the contract?" He was retired and they had just dropped a bombshell on him. He needed a little time to think it over. So they agreed to talk again on Monday morning.

Jim and Mitch made it very clear they were still going to talk to other people. During that weekend, they spoke to both Mike D'Antoni and Mike Dunleavy.

Phil understood that. He wasn't pleading for the job, and they weren't negotiating yet. . . .

[The possibility of Jackson's return excited Lakers fans, who chanted "We want Phil" during the Lakers-Kings game that weekend at Staples Center.]

I asked him that Sunday, "Who is the better coach for this team, you or D'Antoni?"

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|