YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Case against U.S. man illustrates Canada's zero-tolerance gun policy

Charges against a Kentucky man accused of trying to smuggle a firearm into Canada underscore differences between U.S. and Canadian gun laws.

February 03, 2014|By David Zucchino
  • A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer at the U.S.-Canada border in Blaine, Wash.
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer at the U.S.-Canada border… (Elaine Thompson / Associated…)

Louis DiNatale didn't intend to enter Canada when he and his wife wound up on a bridge from New York state to Ontario province one day in September, misdirected by an unreliable GPS. What began as an American couple's getaway to Vermont quickly turned into a lesson on the stark difference between the U.S. and Canada when it comes to gun laws.

DiNatale, whose request to turn around and cross back into the U.S. was denied, then made another mistake. When a border official asked whether he had any weapons, he said no.

Then the questions started about guns. A border agent asked whether he owned any.

"Yes," DiNatale said.

"Why?" an agent asked.

"I told him I was retired military, I had respect for weapons, and I had a concealed carry license to do so," DiNatale said in a statement.

"He asked me when was the last time I had a weapon on me. I told him, 'Earlier that week.' He asked me again, 'Why?' I told him it was my right as an American citizen to do so."

But he was driving his wife's car, and had forgotten he had stowed his Bersa .380 handgun in the center console days earlier.

A search turned up the gun and DiNatale found himself handcuffed and under interrogation by Canadian border officers for allegedly trying to smuggle a loaded handgun into the country — and lying about it. He spent four days in a Canadian jail before he could post bail.

DiNatale's predicament is a cautionary tale for American gun owners: Canada takes gun control more seriously than the U.S. Over the last three years, nearly 1,400 firearms were confiscated at Canadian entry points, most of them personal guns belonging to U.S. citizens.

His Canadian lawyer, Bruce Engel, says Canada overreacted to DiNatale's honest mistake and is using his case to send a message.

"They're trying to make a general blanket statement to American citizens: Don't mess with our borders," Engel said from his office in Ottawa.

DiNatale, 46, a retired Army sergeant major, says he stored the gun in his wife's car a few days earlier because he didn't want it in his car when he drove onto Ft. Knox, Ky., for a dental appointment.

The gun was still in his wife's car when she picked him up from work in Louisville, Ky., to drive to a weekend getaway in Vermont, he says. He remembered it all too well, of course, when Canadian agents confronted him with the weapon after they searched the car at the Thousand Islands Bridge border crossing between New York state and Ontario province.

The agents were unmoved by his explanations even after his wife, Cathy, verified his story.

DiNatale, a former Army legal expert who is now a paralegal in Kentucky, faces three years in jail if convicted; a Canadian court date is scheduled for June. Engel says he will vigorously fight the charges.

"They could have done their homework and looked at his background and seen he's a professional," Engel said. "They could have accepted the word of his wife and released him on his own recognizance."

Instead, Engel said, he was told by a Canadian prosecutor at DiNatale's bail hearing during his jail stay: "Bruce, when it comes to guns, it's kind of a zero-tolerance policy."

For Americans accustomed to routinely carrying guns inside the U.S., the situation changes radically at the Canadian border. The no-tolerance attitude toward guns is similar to that of airport security in the U.S. It made no difference, for instance, that DiNatale's gun is legally licensed (in the U.S., at least) or that he has a valid concealed-carry permit.

Under Canadian law, Americans who want to bring up to three guns across the border must first fill out a form and pay a $25 fee in Canadian dollars. The weapons must be declared at the border post; the form serves as a 60-day gun permit in Canada.

"If you do not declare all firearms or weapons, we will seize them and you may face criminal charges," the Canada Border Services Agency warns on its website. Automatic weapons and silencers are outlawed, and Canada strictly regulates the size of cartridge magazines.

The U.S. Embassy in Ottawa warns U.S. citizens who attempt to enter Canada with guns: "Weapons are strictly controlled." The warning adds: "Canadian law requires that officials seize firearms and weapons … from those who deny having them in their possession. Seized firearms and weapons are never returned."

In DiNatale's case, it seems his mistake was not just unfamiliarity with Canadian laws, but faulty navigation and a poor memory.

If a Canadian citizen made the same mistakes at a U.S. border post, agents would be able to exercise some discretion, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official said. If agents found no evidence of an intent to smuggle weapons, they would probably confiscate the gun and deny entry — but in many cases the offender would not be prosecuted, the official said.

Los Angeles Times Articles