YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsAlito


November 5, 2005 | Henry Weinstein, Times Staff Writer
Until a few days ago, the nearly decade-old case of Sheridan vs. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. was barely known outside legal circles. Now it is evidence in the battle over whether U.S. Appeals Court Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. will gain a seat on the Supreme Court. It is one of several cases being cited by liberal groups as evidence that Alito holds little sympathy for workers who claim they were discriminated against by employers because of their race, sex or age.
November 26, 2005 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
If there is a sure winner in the cases decided by Samuel A. Alito Jr., it is freedom of religion -- any religion. During his 15 years as an appellate judge, President Bush's Supreme Court nominee has written decisions in favor of Muslim police officers in Newark, N.J., who wore beards; a Native American from Pennsylvania who raised sacred black bears; and a Jewish professor who said she was pushed out of her job for refusing to attend faculty events on Friday evenings and Saturdays, her Sabbath.
January 19, 2006 | Maura Reynolds, Times Staff Writer
Senate Democrats emerged from a strategy meeting Wednesday saying that most members appeared inclined to vote against the nomination of Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court, but that they were unlikely to mount a filibuster to halt his confirmation. "Arguments were being made pro and con, but mostly con at the moment," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a key vote on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which vets the nomination before it goes to the full Senate for debate.
December 15, 2005 | From Reuters
The nation's largest labor federation and a coalition of groups that represent disabled Americans said Wednesday that they opposed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr., describing him as a threat to worker and civil rights. The AFL-CIO and the National Coalition for Disability Rights criticized Alito's work as a federal appeals judge over the last 15 years, charging that he has often sided with employers over labor with an excessively restrictive view of federal law.
November 3, 2005 | David Levinson Wilk, DAVID LEVINSON WILK writes for "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" and has constructed crosswords for the L.A. Times, the New York Times and USA Today.
THE ANNOUNCEMENT this week that Samuel A. Alito Jr. is taking Harriet E. Miers' place as President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court should make it clear to everyone that his picks for the high court have nothing to do with the ideological makeup of the Supremes and everything to do with crossword puzzles. I mean, "Alito"? It's a fantastic name for crosswords -- a mere five letters long but brimming with regularly used consonants and vowels (and how generously alternating they are!).
January 15, 2006 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., who is poised to join the Supreme Court by the end of this month, is likely to have an immediate impact in the areas of abortion, religion and the death penalty. Alito's arrival also would set the stage for far-reaching changes in two areas of law that went almost unmentioned during his Senate hearings: election campaigns and the environment. Both issues are to come before the high court next month.
December 24, 2005 | David G. Savage and Richard A. Serrano, Times Staff Writers
Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. said in a 1984 memo that he believed the president's top lawyer should be shielded from being sued for approving illegal, warrantless wiretaps on the grounds of national security, an issue that has flared anew and could complicate his Senate confirmation next month. As a Reagan administration lawyer, Alito faced a pending Supreme Court case that tested whether the U.S. attorney general could be held liable for having ordered an illegal wiretap.
November 15, 2005 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. is having an effect on the Supreme Court before the Senate even takes up his nomination. The justices agreed Monday to hear a Pennsylvania prison officials' appeal -- based on a dissent by Alito -- challenging a ruling that said even the most disruptive and dangerous prison inmates were entitled to receive newspapers and magazines.
November 1, 2006 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
The Supreme Court on Tuesday weighed a $79.5-million verdict to punish cigarette-maker Philip Morris in a closely watched test of whether the justices will put strict limits on big jury awards. This is the most important case of the term for major corporations, which seek to limit such awards, and the outcome probably depends on President Bush's two appointees to the high court. Bush promised to pick justices in the "mold" of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.
Los Angeles Times Articles