CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
January 4, 2011 | Sandy Banks
I'm a dog lover and a football fan. And it doesn't bother me to cheer for Michael Vick, even though he's probably better known right now for his animal cruelty than for his gridiron heroics. His conviction for running a dog-fighting ring isn't something he'll soon leave behind, no matter how far his Philadelphia Eagles carry their winning season or how well he plays in the Pro Bowl this month. President Obama drew fire last week when reports surfaced that he thanked the Eagles' owner, Jeffrey Lurie, for giving Vick a chance to rejoin the game after he served his 19-month prison term.
OPINION
December 30, 2010
Is 'I'm sorry' enough? Re "Obama draws fire for comments on Vick," Dec. 29 There are many kinds of bad conduct in professional sports, but the conduct of Michael Vick is extremely shocking stuff. President Obama's recent comments not only lessen the impact of Vick's offense, they also help condone animal cruelty. Has the president actually read or looked at what this talented and well-paid athlete was doing to living creatures, animals unable to defend themselves from the pain and torture they endured?
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
December 13, 2010 | By Steve Chawkins, Los Angeles Times
More than three decades after the war in Vietnam, a Marine named Robert Lucius had a moment of reckoning on the road to Lai Chau. A naval attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi, he was bound for a rural clinic with a donation of medical equipment. When his car was passed by a motorbike with a wicker basket full of dogs, he locked eyes with one of them. "There was an immediate sense of connection," he said. "You could see the fear, the dread, the helplessness. " A vision raced through his mind: Liberate the dogs.
BUSINESS
December 9, 2010 | By P.J. Huffstutter, Los Angeles Times
Exactly how much space is a chicken legally entitled to have in a California henhouse? A Modesto farmer sued the state and the Humane Society of the United States on Wednesday seeking to answer that question, as egg producers begin overhauling their operations to meet an anti-cruelty measure that was approved by state voters in 2008. The lawsuit, filed in Fresno County Superior Court by egg farmer J.S. West, is asking for a judge to interpret and clarify California's Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act, known as Proposition 2. The 2008 measure, approved by more than 63% of the voters, banned small, confining crates or cages for veal calves, egg-laying hens and pregnant sows.
OPINION
August 3, 2010
In April, the Supreme Court struck down a law making it a crime to sell depictions of cruelty to animals. The 8-1 ruling, which reversed a Virginia man's conviction for selling dogfighting videos, was significant because the court was rejecting the federal government's request that it declare a whole category of expression outside the protection of the 1st Amendment. Now the House has overwhelmingly passed a narrower ban on the sale and distribution of so-called crush videos that raises the same constitutional problem.
NATIONAL
July 22, 2010 | By Richard Simon, Los Angeles Times
The House on Wednesday passed legislation to make it a federal crime to sell videos depicting animal cruelty in response to a Supreme Court ruling that struck down an earlier version of the law. Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-Simi Valley), the bill's chief sponsor, said the measure addressed the court's free-speech concerns while aiming to stop so-called animal crush videos that show women in high heels stomping on puppies, kittens and rabbits. The measure, which passed 416 to 3, headed to the Senate for expected approval.