Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsCalifornia Earthquake Authority
IN THE NEWS

California Earthquake Authority

NEWS
September 5, 1997
An average 11% decrease in the state's earthquake insurance rates--approved in July by the California Earthquake Authority--won the endorsement of Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush on Thursday and will go into effect in November. Quackenbush said those who have already paid for quake insurance this year will get an average rebate of $62 on their premium, either as a refund or a credit on next year's bill. The decrease came after the state geologist, James F.
Advertisement
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 24, 1996
We protest! Now it's our state agency, the California Earthquake Authority, that carries discrimination to a new high through adoption of a "redlining" policy. On behalf of Tarzana Property Owners Assn. members, the following letter has been sent to Charles Quackenbush, California state insurance commissioner, with copies to Gov. Pete Wilson, Sens. Tom Hayden and Herschel Rosenthal, Assemblywoman Sheila Kuehl and Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky: "With earthquake faults crisscrossing the entire state, the San Fernando Valley should not be singled out as 'most vulnerable, therefore most liable financially' (our quote)
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 28, 1995 | ED BOND, SPECIAL TO THE TIMES
Although given preliminary approval by the state Legislature and Gov. Pete Wilson, the future of the proposed California Earthquake Authority is in doubt. The privately financed, publicly managed agency would sell earthquake coverage on behalf of insurance companies and limit insurers' losses in the event of a catastrophe such as the Northridge earthquake. Insurance industry experts have predicted the total payout for the 1994 temblor could exceed $12.5 billion.
REAL ESTATE
November 28, 2004 | Jeff Bertolucci, Special to The Times
More California homeowners are passing on earthquake insurance. Between 1999 and 2003, there was a 52% decline in the number of earthquake policies in the state, according to the California Department of Insurance. Today, less than 15% of California homes have the coverage. Since a standard homeowners' policy doesn't cover earthquake damage, the vast majority of consumers will have to rely on federal grants or loans -- or their own bank accounts -- to pay for any future quake-related repairs.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
August 9, 1996
"Insurers Are Finding a Friend in Quackenbush" (editorial, Aug. 2) mentions that there is more than one way to approach the earthquake insurance problem. That is a given. The Northridge earthquake put 20th Century Fire and Casualty out of business. There is no actuarial method of determining an adequate premium for earthquake insurance as we know it today. Therefore, any company that sells earthquake policies could be put out of business with the next major earthquake. Does it make sense to say the insurance companies have something to gain with the creation of the California Earthquake Authority, when in reality they just want to be able to stay in business after the next earthquake hits?
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
May 3, 1997 | KENNETH REICH, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The governing board of the California Earthquake Authority on Friday named Greg Butler its permanent chief executive officer, drawing an unusually sharp blast from state Senate Democratic leader Bill Lockyer (D-Hayward). Lockyer called Butler, who has been serving as interim head of the state insurance agency, "a young political hack with little or no expertise in insurance or earthquakes" and charged that the appointment is "a slap to California homeowners." "It is outrageous. It is corrupt.
BUSINESS
September 29, 2001 | From Bloomberg News
The California Earthquake Authority said it's protected at least until the end of next year from any damage to the reinsurance industry after the terror attacks that toppled the World Trade Center. The earthquake authority, a privately funded, publicly managed agency that provides earthquake insurance to homeowners, had secured $1.97 billion in reinsurance contracts through December 2002 before the attacks Sept. 11.
REAL ESTATE
December 12, 2004
Regarding "Earthquake Policies Dwindle in California," [by Jeff Bertolucci, Nov. 28]: At the time of the Northridge earthquake, I had earthquake insurance. My house had about $60,000 of structural damage but little loss of personal possessions. Because my wife has asthma, we could not live in the house while repairs were underway. Our insurance not only paid for the repairs (after the deductible) but also for us to live in an apartment for seven months. After the Legislature "reformed" earthquake insurance, I allowed our policy to lapse.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|