Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsCalifornia Earthquake Authority
IN THE NEWS

California Earthquake Authority

BUSINESS
March 20, 2011 | Kathy M. Kristof, Personal Finance
Japan's massive earthquake has created a surge of interest in quake insurance in a place more than 5,000 miles away ? California. "Earthquakes are clearly on the top of people's minds," said Glenn Pomeroy, chief executive of the California Earthquake Authority, a nonprofit group designed to make quake coverage available to any Californian who wants it. "The images coming out of Japan are surreal, and the news just keeps getting worse and...
Advertisement
REAL ESTATE
November 28, 2004 | Jeff Bertolucci, Special to The Times
More California homeowners are passing on earthquake insurance. Between 1999 and 2003, there was a 52% decline in the number of earthquake policies in the state, according to the California Department of Insurance. Today, less than 15% of California homes have the coverage. Since a standard homeowners' policy doesn't cover earthquake damage, the vast majority of consumers will have to rely on federal grants or loans -- or their own bank accounts -- to pay for any future quake-related repairs.
OPINION
January 17, 2014 | By Dave Jones
Almost exactly 20 years ago, early on the morning of Jan. 17, 1994, residents of the San Fernando Valley were jolted awake by incredible shaking. Within moments, the Santa Monica Freeway - the major east-west artery in Los Angeles - came crashing down in huge sections; apartment houses pancaked, trapping and killing residents; and houses toppled off their foundations. It was no wonder. The magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake had just produced the strongest ground motions ever recorded in any American urban environment.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 28, 1995 | ED BOND, SPECIAL TO THE TIMES
Although given preliminary approval by the state Legislature and Gov. Pete Wilson, the future of the proposed California Earthquake Authority is in doubt. The privately financed, publicly managed agency would sell earthquake coverage on behalf of insurance companies and limit insurers' losses in the event of a catastrophe such as the Northridge earthquake. Insurance industry experts have predicted the total payout for the 1994 temblor could exceed $12.5 billion.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
August 9, 1996
"Insurers Are Finding a Friend in Quackenbush" (editorial, Aug. 2) mentions that there is more than one way to approach the earthquake insurance problem. That is a given. The Northridge earthquake put 20th Century Fire and Casualty out of business. There is no actuarial method of determining an adequate premium for earthquake insurance as we know it today. Therefore, any company that sells earthquake policies could be put out of business with the next major earthquake. Does it make sense to say the insurance companies have something to gain with the creation of the California Earthquake Authority, when in reality they just want to be able to stay in business after the next earthquake hits?
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
May 3, 1997 | KENNETH REICH, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The governing board of the California Earthquake Authority on Friday named Greg Butler its permanent chief executive officer, drawing an unusually sharp blast from state Senate Democratic leader Bill Lockyer (D-Hayward). Lockyer called Butler, who has been serving as interim head of the state insurance agency, "a young political hack with little or no expertise in insurance or earthquakes" and charged that the appointment is "a slap to California homeowners." "It is outrageous. It is corrupt.
BUSINESS
September 29, 2001 | From Bloomberg News
The California Earthquake Authority said it's protected at least until the end of next year from any damage to the reinsurance industry after the terror attacks that toppled the World Trade Center. The earthquake authority, a privately funded, publicly managed agency that provides earthquake insurance to homeowners, had secured $1.97 billion in reinsurance contracts through December 2002 before the attacks Sept. 11.
REAL ESTATE
December 12, 2004
Regarding "Earthquake Policies Dwindle in California," [by Jeff Bertolucci, Nov. 28]: At the time of the Northridge earthquake, I had earthquake insurance. My house had about $60,000 of structural damage but little loss of personal possessions. Because my wife has asthma, we could not live in the house while repairs were underway. Our insurance not only paid for the repairs (after the deductible) but also for us to live in an apartment for seven months. After the Legislature "reformed" earthquake insurance, I allowed our policy to lapse.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|