CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
December 17, 1998 | DANIEL YI, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday cleared the way for the second round in one of the nation's highest profile and most expensive palimony battles, one involving Orange County flashlight mogul Anthony Maglica. The court denied a request by Maglica's attorneys for a hearing, sending the long-running case back for a new trial. In 1994, an Orange County jury ordered Maglica to pay his companion of 20 years, Claire Maglica, $84 million.
NEWS
September 2, 1998 | Times Staff and Wire Reports
A state appeals court Monday overturned an $84-million palimony award to a woman who lived, worked and shared a name with flashlight mogul Anthony Maglica, saying that her work in building his business did not entitle her to a share of it. But the 4th District Court of Appeal ordered a new trial on the dispute, saying that the jury that made the award in 1994 was given erroneous instructions on how to value Claire Maglica's services.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
September 2, 1998 | ESTHER SCHRADER, TIMES STAFF WRITER
A state appeals court Monday overturned a $84-million palimony award to a woman who lived, worked and shared a name with flashlight mogul Anthony Maglica, saying her work in building his business did not entitle her to a share of it. But the 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana ordered a new trial on the dispute, saying the jury that made the award in 1994 was given erroneous instructions on how to value Claire Maglica's services.
NEWS
May 14, 1994 | RENE LYNCH and LEE ROMNEY, TIMES STAFF WRITERS
In a palimony award believed to be the nation's largest, an Orange County jury ruled Friday that flashlight mogul Anthony Maglica must pay $84 million to a woman he lived, worked and shared his name with for more than 20 years but never married.
NEWS
May 14, 1994 | LEE ROMNEY and RENE LYNCH, TIMES STAFF WRITERS
In a palimony award believed to be the largest ever made, an Orange County jury ruled Friday that flashlight mogul Anthony Maglica must pay $84 million to a woman he lived, worked and shared his name with for more than 20 years, but never married. The Superior Court jury determined that Maglica, 64, and his former companion, Claire Maglica, 60, had no oral or written agreement to equally share earnings from a former machine shop the couple successfully turned into Mag Instrument Inc.
NEWS
May 8, 1994 | LEE ROMNEY, TIMES STAFF WRITER
Move over, Luke and Laura. These days, daytime television watchers are glued to the real-life drama of Claire and Tony, the high society Orange County couple whose bitter palimony battle is being broadcast live from Santa Ana on Court TV. That's the cable network that broadcasts trials from all over the country, and this week network officials say they have been swamped with hundreds of calls from viewers hooked on Maglica vs.