Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsInitiative Process
IN THE NEWS

Initiative Process

CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
January 31, 1998
Re "Too Many Ballot Initiatives," editorial, Jan. 21: The trouble is not with the initiative process; it is with the Legislature. Time and again the Legislature has reacted to some initiative idea that it abhorred by devising a quarter-loaf alternative, hoping this would outpoll the people's proposal and essentially preserve the status quo. A responsible Legislature would, instead, take the initiative idea and rework its language so as to eliminate the...
Advertisement
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
February 9, 1992
I favor amending the state Constitution so the legislative and executive branches have no role in redistricting. They are clearly too corrupted by partisan politics and conflicts of interest to be trusted with the task. Nonpartisan think tanks may already have done research on alternatives to California's dysfunctional system of political redistricting. If they haven't, it is time for them to do so and publish issue papers on the subject. Then it will be time for citizens of all political persuasions to make use of the initiative process for the public good.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
October 15, 1988
Extortionary is not a strong enough word to describe auto insurance rates in California. Stealing, with the consent of the law, is more accurate. The insurance industry does not play by anti-trust rules, and our elected officials choose to ignore the problem. Your article suggested Proposition 103 is strong medicine prescribed by a crowd of consumer advocates backed by Nader. We are fortunate to have the initiative process and a friend named Nader. JOE E. FAY Burbank
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
February 11, 1989
After reading Davis' column on gun control, I was left with the impression that he expects laws to be written by opposing factions of the issue. If this were the case we wouldn't need legislators. Come on, Senator, that's what you were elected to do. As long as you and others sit back and wait for unanimity the slaughter will continue until the people, once again, are forced to use the initiative process. C.D. HARTT West Hills
REAL ESTATE
July 13, 1986
Saul M. Salka's letter (July 6) suggesting "constructive changes" to the Braude/Yaroslavsky density initiative reveals a lack of understanding of the initiative and its goal of restricting and limiting destructive impact of excessive commercial development in primarily residential areas. His letter was a mishmash of bad arithmetic, misinformation and confusion on the initiative process. Very few architects will agree with Salka's assertion that "the most gifted architects might find it impossible to design a building" if the initiative passes.
OPINION
September 25, 2008
Re "State's financial trauma just beginning," Sept. 21 Any reform to the California budget process should include prohibiting the use of the initiative process to mandate spending, whether through direct spending mandates or bond issues. The most prominent example of this, of course, is Proposition 98, which mandates spending about 40% of the general fund budget on education. Proposition 6 on the general election ballot in November mandates spending on state and local law enforcement, even when crime has decreased statewide.
BUSINESS
December 22, 1996
The California initiative process urgently needs reform, as Judy B. Rosener so clearly explains ("Take the Initiative to Reform the Process," Dec. 1). But Ms. Rosener is a wild and crazy optimist if she thinks Gov. Wilson--or "Wanna-be Gov." Dan Lungren--will propose or accept changes in a system they have manipulated so effectively to their political advantage. Corporations tired of pouring money into the defeat of specific initiatives after they qualify for the ballot might be better off spending their dollars on a year-round campaign to persuade voters to stop signing every petition that's put under their noses.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
April 11, 1990
Willie Brown strikes again, exhibiting his contempt for the voters of California. His comments in your article on the initiative process speaks to that point. For years, the Legislature, under his leadership, either failed to act or passed wimpy legislation in the areas of insurance reform, campaign financing, ethics, anti-smoking and environmental issues. At the same time, Willie and his gang had very little problem taking money from any special-interest group that could pay their price to pass laws suited to their fancy.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
October 23, 1985
Your editorial is, in effect, an endorsement of that corrupt distortion of the representative process known as gerrymandering. If all votes were taken "at large" the one-man-one-vote principle would insure a direct connection between the will of the people and the legislative process. But we do not vote at large for the legislature. We vote by districts. When district boundaries are distorted for partisan or philosophical purposes, the result is a distortion of the people's will and a growing public disenchantment with the entire political process.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|