YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsIntelligence


July 21, 2010 | By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times
A Marine colonel at the center of a court-martial case about leaking secret intelligence information to civilian law enforcement agencies has died, the Marine Corps announced Tuesday. Larry Richards, a Marine reservist and retired Los Angeles County sheriff's detective, died Saturday of natural causes. He faced multiple charges and had been scheduled for an Article 32 hearing, akin to a preliminary hearing. The case involves allegations that Marines working for Richards in the intelligence division at Camp Pendleton gave him classified documents about purported terrorism threats so he could share them with an anti-terrorism task force organized by the Sheriff's Department.
December 30, 2009 | By Josh Meyer, Peter Nicholas and Alana Semuels
U.S. intelligence agencies had enough "bits and pieces" of information to thwart the attempted Christmas Day airplane bombing, a senior administration official said Tuesday, but they failed to properly analyze and share it. Instead, what President Obama called a potentially catastrophic "mix of human and systemic failures" allowed a 23-year-old Nigerian to board a U.S.-bound airliner, allegedly hiding an explosive device that could have killed nearly...
June 29, 1989
The following are excerpts from The Times' interview with President Bush, conducted by Washington Bureau Chief Jack Nelson and staff writers James Gerstenzang and David Lauter: Question: . . . There was a report in one of the magazines here that you were concerned or dissatisfied with the intelligence out of China and for that reason William Webster, the CIA director, would be on his way out at the end of the year. Answer: That was one of the dumbest reports I've read, and most absurd and most without fact.
April 30, 2013 | By Ken Dilanian, Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON - The CIA and departments of Justice and Homeland Security have begun a high-level internal review of whether intelligence was mishandled prior to the Boston Marathon bombings, though President Obama and his top advisors said they had seen nothing to suggest counter-terrorism agencies did anything wrong. Obama said at a White House news conference that the review would seek to answer whether "additional things … could have been done" that "might have prevented" the two bombings that killed three people and injured more than 260 others on April 15. "We want to go back and we want to review every step that was taken," Obama said.
August 26, 2004
Re "Proposal to Abolish CIA Riles Intelligence Leaders," Aug. 24: With all the bureaucratic blather that we're hearing now about how to improve the intelligence community by adding a "czar," one important fact has been forgotten: We already have a chief of intelligence; he's called the president, and so far he has been an abysmal failure in protecting our country. Why add another bureaucrat who can be blamed for the president's failures? Let's just change presidents. William Bergmann Hollywood President Truman dissolved the Office of Strategic Services after World War II because he did not want to run the risk of having an "American Gestapo."
April 3, 2005
Re "U.S. Spy Efforts Face a New Round of Criticism," March 28: It is humanly possible to make the mistake of misreading intelligence information regarding weapons of mass destruction. What is absolutely not right is that in the process of that mistake you kill tens of thousands of people who had nothing to do with WMD. That you detain without trial many thousands of individuals who had nothing to do with WMD. That you torture and denigrate many hundreds and that you kill while in custody many dozens who also had nothing to do with WMD. That is a war crime, not a mistake.
July 26, 2003
Re "9/11 Report Cites CIA, FBI Lapses," July 25: I don't understand how no one has been fired or demoted at the FBI or CIA. If my inept job skills caused 3,000 Americans to die, you can bet I would be out of a job immediately. But hold a cushy government job and fail miserably, and no one is ever penalized, no matter how inept their actions. Dave Koepke West Hills Our intelligence agencies are drawing criticism from all sides; they're not as good as we thought and they're not doing what we pay them for. They failed to remove an untrue statement from the president's State of the Union speech, and they let us down in the run-up to 9/11.
December 24, 1988
I was somewhat shocked after reading Bill Christine's (Dec. 22) column regarding Santa Anita's dropping of the Pick Six. I happen to feel that this exotic is one of the very best bets available to racing fans. And, it's not just the cancellation of the Pick Six that bothers me; it's also an insult to my intelligence when Santa Anita management attempts to justify it by pointing to those big, bad out-of-town syndicates. Give me a break, Mr. Goodrich (Santa Anita's general manager)
February 15, 1988 | Compiled by Times Science Writer Thomas Maugh II from research presented at the meeting of the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science in Boston last week
It is not the size of a brain that is the mark of high intelligence, but how efficiently it works, according to psychiatrist Richard J. Haier of UC Irvine. Haier found that the brains of people who perform well on intelligence tests expend less energy than the brains of poor performers, and may have more efficient neural circuitry.
February 21, 2005
Re "The New Spy in Chief," editorial, Feb. 18: Isn't it ironic how The Times demurely backs the appointment of John D. Negroponte when, in fact, hackles should be raised from Bangor to Monterey. This man is a prime example of the good-old-boy network that surrounded presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush. Do we forget so quickly the disgraceful little war we waged against Nicaragua, and the pressure applied to neighboring Honduras by Negroponte to cave in and allow the country to be used as a staging area by the U.S.-fueled contras?
Los Angeles Times Articles