ENTERTAINMENT
August 30, 2009 | Tony Phillips
Far beyond the moon and stars, Twenty light-years south of Mars, Spins the gentle Bunny Planet, And the Bunny Queen is Janet. -- Voyage to the Bunny Planet by Rosemary Wells Kids love the Bunny Planet books by Rosemary Wells. Maybe you failed a test, or ate a bad hot dog, or got in trouble for making rude noises on the school bus. No problem! Janet the Bunny Queen will make you feel better. If only the Bunny Planet were real -- it almost was. A few years ago, astronomer Mike Brown of Caltech discovered a small planet.
SCIENCE
September 15, 2006 | John Johnson Jr., Times Staff Writer
According to Greek mythology, the goddess Eris was so miffed at being left off the guest list of a banquet of the gods that she stirred up the Trojan War. Could there be a better name than that of the goddess of discord for the dwarf planet that spawned a pitched battle among astronomers and threw the public's ideas about the solar system into a cocked hat? Apparently not.
NATIONAL
August 20, 2006 | John Johnson Jr., Times Staff Writer
Question: What is a planet? Answer: Something round that orbits a star, according to the new definition proposed last week by the International Astronomical Union. In the case of our solar system, that star is the sun. Q: Didn't we already know that? A: Actually, no. Although many people thought they knew what a planet was, there had been no clear definition that all astronomers could agree on. Q: So why do we need one now? A: Recent discoveries of bodies in the Kuiper Belt, a huge region of icy objects beyond the orbit of Neptune, raised the question of whether they should be considered planets.
SCIENCE
August 16, 2006 | John Johnson Jr., Times Staff Writer
There goes the solar system. The elite society of nine lordly bodies of rock, ice and gas would grow to at least 12 and as many as 53 members under a new definition of "planet" proposed Tuesday by the International Astronomical Union. The core of the definition? Planets are round. And they orbit a star. The proposal was hammered out after two years of intense astronomical debate among leading experts of the Astronomical Union, the international authority for naming celestial objects.
OPINION
October 12, 2002
Poor besotted Pluto--the planet, not Mickey's dog. In case you haven't paid close attention to the distant reaches of our corner of space, after 72 years of distinction as the outermost planet in our solar system, that lumbering hunk of ice and rock that hasn't completed one single solar orbit since the American Revolution may not be a planet anymore. Not that such a decision down here would alter the minus-400-degree temperature out there.
SCIENCE
October 8, 2002 | USHA LEE McFARLING, TIMES STAFF WRITER
What's a planet anyway? The International Astronomical Union, the group charged with coming up with definitions and names for astronomical objects, has never had a formal definition for "planet." It's never really needed one. Many textbooks and encyclopedias don't even formally define the word. Why should they? It's always been so simple. For centuries, planets were considered to be big, round objects that orbited a sun and reflected light but did not give off light of their own.