YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsInternational Law

International Law

November 5, 1992
William Smith's attempt to justify the U.S. government's kidnaping of Dr. Humberto Alvarez Machain, a Mexican citizen, from Mexico without Mexico's permission is full of holes ("A Question of Morality Over Legality," Column Right, Oct. 25). First, what Smith terms "foreign politicians' whinings" are in fact diplomatic protests relating to a gross violation by the United States of a fundamental principle of international law. This U.S. disregard for rules of territorial sovereignty has harmed our relations with other countries, damaged our credibility when we claim to uphold the rule of law in the world, and adversely affected our ability to negotiate successful treaties.
May 20, 1994
Ira A. Korff has resigned as president and director of National Amusements Ltd., the Dedham, Mass.-based movie theater company controlled by his former father-in-law, Viacom Inc. Chairman Sumner Redstone. No successor has been named by the closely held company, which owns 850 movie screens and is the controlling shareholder of Viacom. Korff, 44, was divorced two years ago from Redstone's only daughter, Shari E. Redstone, who joined the executive ranks of National Amusements last year.
March 25, 2003 | Erwin Chemerinsky, Erwin Chemerinsky, a professor of law and political science at USC, was one of the plaintiffs and co-counsel in a lawsuit brought on behalf of the Guantanamo detainees.
On Sunday, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld quickly invoked international law in condemning Iraq's treatment of American prisoners of war and its use of civilians as human shields. As soon as the Americans were shown on television, Rumsfeld denounced Iraq for violating the Geneva accords, which govern the treatment of prisoners of war. But Rumsfeld's hypocrisy here is enormous.
March 26, 2008 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
The Supreme Court rebuffed President Bush on Tuesday for exceeding his powers under the law, ruling he does not have the "unilateral authority" to force state officials to comply with an international treaty. The Constitution gives the president the power "to execute the laws, not make them," said Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Unless Congress passes a law to enforce a treaty, the president usually cannot do it on his own, he said.
February 20, 1986 | From Times Wire Services
The State Department said Wednesday that it is convinced that Iraq is using poison gas again in its war against Iran, a serious violation of international law. The department, confirming allegations made by Iran, said: "Information available to us strongly suggests that Iraq has used chemical weapons in the latest round of fighting. We condemn this, as we have consistently in the past."
May 20, 2004
The Israeli army is using American F-16s firing rockets and American Caterpillar tractors to destroy civilian housing in Rafah in the Gaza Strip (May 18). Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said in Jordan on Sunday that his country was opposed to the demolition of Palestinian homes in Rafah. It's "a subject of conversation and a subject of concern," national security advisor Condoleezza Rice said. Where is the outrage from U.S. officials? Munitions we give to Israel should not be used against innocent civilians.
February 10, 1993
In response to your editorial, "Let the Mideast Negotiations Resume," Feb. 3: The maneuver by Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin to prevent sanctions against Israel for defiance of Resolution 799 displays contempt for the United Nations, international law, justice, human rights and anti-Arab racism. There can be no peace without justice and justice can never be achieved in negotiations controlled by tricksters who have no ethics. PAMELA WINTERS Downey
January 16, 1990
I have read the editorial with a very great interest and with one reservation: The editorial could have added one exception to the treatment of the issue. The editorial rightly supports the principle of the prohibition of unilateral intervention in violation of the sovereignty of other nations. Certainly, to intervene militarily in the affairs of another nation is against international law and common sense, as in the case of the U.S. in Panama. But to intervene in the affairs of another nation whose leaders order the slaughter of millions of their own people, as in the case of Cambodia, should not be against international law. It is against international law because we are very selfish: Really we don't want "to rock the boat."
Los Angeles Times Articles