February 23, 2013
Re “ Leave Hollywood to liberals ,” Opinion, Feb. 19 For once, I agree with Jonah Goldberg: In the name of freedom, let Hollywood continue to produce whatever politically tinged films it wants. Whether it's shoot-em-up violence, drama, comedy or liberal high-mindedness, the viewers will decide what they want to watch without any coercion. And yes, as Goldberg notes, Archie Bunker of “All in the Family” did have a bigger impact on Americans' values than his “meathead” son-in-law, but probably not for the reason he thinks.
November 30, 2013
Re "Hail the panderer in chief," Opinion, Nov. 26 According to Jonah Goldberg, President Obama is rigidly ideological and shamelessly pandering at the same time. Neat trick. The president's Affordable Care Act may be many things, but the ideologically progressive position it is not. We progressives wanted a single-payer, Medicare-for-all program. Failing that, we wanted a "public option. " What we got instead was a market-based program first proposed by the Heritage Foundation and first put in place in Massachusetts by the last Republican presidential candidate.
February 15, 2014
Re "Bet on a dark horse in 2016," Opinion, Feb. 11 Jonah Goldberg refers to the Allied invasion of Normandy in World War II as "that whole invading-Europe-and-defeating-Hitler thing. " Thousands of Allied soldiers gave their lives for freedom in that "thing. " Referring to one of the most important events of the 20th century as a mere "thing" goes too far. Were it not for that "thing," Goldberg might not have the freedom to be so nasty in print. Joseph R. Tripp Palmdale ALSO: Letters: The DWP's solar woes Letters: The British aren't coming Letters: When the target is an American
April 16, 2006
Re "D.C. -- on screen and unfiltered," Opinion, April 13 In his haste to manufacture a line of thought for his column, Jonah Goldberg makes the ridiculous statement that Hollywood has yet to make a great film about our nation's capital. As a former congressional aide and native of the Washington area, I object to this thinking. Goldberg has either forgotten or hasn't seen "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington," "The Senator Was Indiscreet," "All the President's Men," "The Contender," "Traffic" and, recently, "Syriana."
June 29, 2009
Re "Obama's Iran plan is a bomb," Opinion, June 23 Here is one immutable fact of Jonah Goldberg's columns: If it starts with, "Here is one immutable fact ..." then we know he is about to tell a lie and spend the rest of his column embellishing it. The most recent one is that President Obama's foreign policy relating to Iran was wrongheaded, naive and has been made irrelevant by recent events there. Nothing could be further from the truth, of course, but Goldberg and his friends on the increasingly irrelevant right will say anything to try to make the president look bad. When unsettling news arrives from Iran, their first impulse is to throw blame his way to see if it sticks.
January 26, 2008
Re "What 'The Daily Show' cut," Opinion, Jan. 22 Jonah Goldberg is the funniest political writer in America today -- right up there with Stephen Colbert. But while Colbert mocks the oafishness of "Fox News" commentators, Goldberg just parodies himself. His stint on "The Daily Show" -- where he promoted his book claiming that fascism was a term that, although it applied to a few extremists on the right wing such as Nazis, actually meant "progressives" -- was brilliant, worthy of Borat.
April 27, 2009
Re "Belch, there goes democracy," Opinion, April 21 Does Jonah Goldberg expect us to be shocked -- shocked! -- that the Environmental Protection Agency can regulate our air? He objects to an "undemocratic" Supreme Court decision, but the court was only clarifying laws passed by a more democratic organization called "Congress" that Goldberg seems to be unaware of. He may not think that global warming needs immediate action, but fortunately, decisions about that are made by scientists who have devoted their careers to this issue.
April 6, 2013
Re "Disability: the new welfare?," Opinion, April 2 Jonah Goldberg is correct that the increase in Social Security disability beneficiaries deserves scrutiny, but he shows a misunderstanding of how the program works. It is relatively challenging for a claimant to qualify for benefits. The Social Security Administration does not simply accept certification from a physician, and it has its own evaluation units that comb through medical records. So why are there so many more people receiving disability?
December 5, 2005
Re "Hold the holy in those happy holidays," Opinion, Dec. 1 Why does everything have to turn into a battle? Jonah Goldberg, the judges wouldn't be doing their jobs if, when the people bring cases to court, they just said, "Never mind -- we are supposed to mind our own business." This whole idea that by saying "happy holidays" you're anti-Christmas is bogus. I don't know what holiday everyone I meet celebrates -- there are actually other holidays of significance celebrated during this season.
April 10, 2006
Re "Egalite, liberte, 401(k)," Opinion, April 6 Once again, Jonah Goldberg has shown us that his contributions from the right-wing noise box are as devoid of logical coherence as they are of civility and relevance. Am I supposed to take away from his column that because I may have voted against President Bush and am unhappy with the way Congress has allowed many of our government's organs to be dangerously compromised, I am not only a radical leftist but French as well? How else am I supposed to interpret his assigning the positions of the latest incarnation of French protesters onto his vague "liberal left" in the United States?