NEWS
October 12, 2008 | Ken Ritter, Associated Press
O.J. Simpson's lawyers cited judicial errors and insufficient evidence Friday in seeking a new trial for the former football star, who was convicted of kidnapping and robbing two sports memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a casino hotel room. "Simpson should be granted a new trial," attorney Gabriel Grasso wrote in a motion faulting Clark County District Judge Jackie Glass' decisions during jury selection, her limitations on cross-examination of witnesses during trial and her instructions to jurors before deliberations.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
March 22, 2007 | Peter Y. Hong, Times Staff Writer
Before he was sentenced to death Wednesday, Ivan J. Hill's lawyers made their final arguments to spare his life. Then the families of the six women he raped and strangled got their first chance to tell him where they thought he belonged. Essentially, they agreed with Mary Brooks, the mother of one of the victims, who spoke first. "You should go to hell," Brooks said, as others in the courtroom murmured in agreement. Brooks looked straight at Hill, who sat silently in an orange jail suit.
SPORTS
December 10, 2006 | Michael A. Hiltzik, Times Staff Writer
The worldwide sports anti-doping program, created to fight performanceenhancing drug use in international athletics, imposes severe punishments for accidental or technical infractions, relies at times on disputed scientific evidence and resists outside scrutiny, a Times investigation has found.
NATIONAL
November 18, 2006 | Ellen Barry, Times Staff Writer
This is as close to a courtroom as Daniel Donohue can hope to get: a nondescript room in a church office building, where three priests on Friday carried out a legal procedure that dates to the 12th century. The experience was at once ordinary and archaic. A tape recorder sat next to him, beeping occasionally. Behind him sat the "promoter of justice," the New York Archdiocese's equivalent of a district attorney. When Donohue walked in, he was asked to sign an oath not to discuss the case again.
OPINION
April 20, 2006
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A social scientist to realize that racially diverse juries might engage in more give-and-take than homogeneous ones. Still, it's reassuring to learn that a study by a psychologist has concluded that multiracial juries are more deliberative than all-white panels. The study by professor Samuel R. Sommers of Tufts University should give impetus to a lonely campaign by a member of the U.S.
NATIONAL
March 28, 2006 | David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
In a long-awaited test of executive power, the Supreme Court today will take up a constitutional challenge to President Bush's decision to try alleged war criminals before specially arranged military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It is an authority the president's lawyers say is part of his power as commander in chief.