YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsJudge


October 31, 1986
Tucked in among the mudslinging and brochure-mailing contests on Tuesday's ballot are several races involving candidates that most Orange County voters never heard of. The candidates are attorneys seeking election as judge, or 4th District Court of Appeal justices running unopposed and seeking voter confirmation for another term. All of the justices deserve reelection. There is no opposition to any of them, nor is there a reason for any.
April 25, 2008
Re "Who should judge?" endorsement, April 21 Your editorial does a grave disservice. Rather than blithely extolling the virtues of your picks, you ought to take the time to recite the backgrounds of all of the candidates for Los Angeles Superior Court judge and then explain why you believe that your selections are the proper ones. You also ought to take into consideration the evaluations of the Los Angeles County Bar Assn.'s analysis and ratings of the candidates. Then your readers might be able to make a more appropriate decision about who to vote for in the June primary election.
August 19, 2001
In the letters section of your Aug. 12 edition, Debra St. Germain of Thousand Oaks commented on Justice Steve Perren's nomination to the California Supreme Court. In her letter, Ms. Germain opines that Perren's nomination must be due to some "back-room dealing" and that he would be a "mediocre appointment." Ms. Germain then castigates the local press for failing to investigate how the appointment came about. Ms. Germain is singularly misinformed on the subject of Justice Perren.
February 22, 1991
Since Justice Allen E. Broussard of the state Supreme Court announced plans for retirement, we have heard calls for Gov. Pete Wilson to appoint a successor who will maintain "balance" on the court (e.g., editorial, "The Chance to Make a Great Appointment," Feb. 11). In this situation, "balance" is a code word for the appointment of a liberal judge. The editorial refers to a period 25 years ago when the California Supreme Court is said to have been "widely regarded as the nation's most respected state court."
August 13, 2013 | By Robin Abcarian
How perfectly welcome a judicial intervention might have been had Jaleesa Martin and her baby's father decided to name their little boy Idiotface or Stupidhead. Any responsible family court judge would have recognized the emotional abuse inherent in bestowing such a derogatory name upon a child. But Messiah? Dear God. You've got to be joking. As my colleague Matt Pearce reported , 7-month-old Messiah Deshawn Martin, who lives in Newport, a small town in Eastern Tennessee, was the subject of a dispute between his parents over his last name, not his first name.
January 14, 2013 | By Phil Willon, Los Angeles Times
Before sunrise, a troubled 10-year-old Riverside boy quietly crept downstairs with a loaded revolver, held it at his sleeping father's head and, using two fingers, squeezed the trigger. That's not in dispute. Neither is this: The youngster will be a free man before his 23rd birthday, if not sooner. A Riverside County judge will make the difficult decision Monday about whether the boy, now 12, possessed the mental capacity to know it was wrong to kill his father, an abusive neo-Nazi activist.
August 4, 2010 | Rong-Gong Lin II
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger praised a San Francisco's judge decision throwing out California's ban on same-sex marriage, saying it "affirms the full legal protections and safeguards I believe everyone deserves." "He heard in-depth arguments from both sides on fundamental questions of due process, equal protection and freedom from discrimination. There are strong feelings on both sides of this issue, and I am glad that all viewpoints were respected throughout the proceedings," he said.
April 10, 2013 | By Andrew Blankstein
A judge refused to dismiss the case against an 86-year-old murder defendant Wednesday morning and ordered county officials to devise a plan to care for the suspect while protecting public safety. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Norman Shapiro declined to release Nattie Kennebrew, who is legally blind, in a wheelchair and suffers from severe dementia, despite a probate court ruling that determined he could be released into the guardianship of his son. Under state law, defendants cannot be held beyond three years at a state mental facility if they are found incompetent to stand trial -- unless it is determined that they remain a threat to society.
August 6, 2010 | By Andrew Blankstein, Los Angeles Times
A judge Thursday upheld her order barring the Los Angeles Times from publishing images of a man accused of killing four people —- including three members of the same family — after a photographer shot several dozen pictures that the court had granted him permission to take. The ruling by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Hilleri G. Merritt came during a hearing in which The Times asked the judge to vacate a decision she made Wednesday, saying the order constituted a prior restraint on publication in clear violation of the 1st Amendment.
August 13, 2013 | By Michael McGough
As a 1st Amendment matter, it's an easy call. A judge in Tennessee was engaging in a forbidden “establishment of religion” when she refused to allow a couple to name their baby Messiah. “The word 'Messiah' is a title, and it's a title that has only been earned by one person, and that one person is Jesus Christ,” Magistrate Lu Ann Ballew told the parents of the 7-month-old boy. The judge came up with a non-messianic alternative: “Martin DeShawn McCullough.” The only reason the judge was involved at all was that the parents couldn't agree on Messiah's last name.
Los Angeles Times Articles