OPINION
November 28, 2011 | By Marcy Valenzuela
Juvenile dependency courts exist to protect children and youths who have been neglected and abused, so it's shocking that the presiding judge who oversees the Los Angeles County Superior Court's juvenile division is pushing a plan that puts foster children and youths at risk of further harm. If Judge Michael Nash's order stands, vulnerable children, youths and their families, who are already dealing with painful consequences of neglect and abuse, would face the additional burden of proving why the most intimate details of their lives should be kept private.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 21, 2011 | By Garrett Therolf, Los Angeles Times
Dozens of foster children and attorneys protested Monday outside Los Angeles County's Edelman Children's Court in opposition to the proposed opening of juvenile dependency hearings to the public. Currently, members of the media and public are barred from entering dependency courtrooms without court permission. But Judge Michael Nash proposed a blanket order this month that would make the hearings open unless someone objects and a judge decides to close the proceeding. Lucias Bouge, a 19-year-old former foster youth opposed to Nash's proposal, said: "Kids laughed at me because of the way I talked, because my family was poor and because I was different from everybody else.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 9, 2011 | By Garrett Therolf, Los Angeles Times
The presiding judge of Los Angeles County's Juvenile Court is preparing to open child dependency proceedings to the public in an effort to improve accountability and transparency in child abuse, neglect and foster care placement cases. Currently, members of the media and the public are barred from entering dependency courtrooms without court permission. But Judge Michael Nash is proposing a blanket order that would make the hearings open unless someone objects and a judge decides to close the proceeding.
WORLD
October 1, 2011 | By Raheem Salman, Los Angeles Times
When Suad Dabbagh and two other women graduated from Iraq's Judicial Institute in 1979, they became the first female judges in a nation run by Saddam Hussein. The novelty led to a deluge of news photo and interview requests. But progress was short-lived. By the mid-1980s, when Hussein's government once again stopped accepting women in its judicial study program, there were only six female judges. These days, after eight wrenching years of invasion, occupation and rebuilding, the outlook is different: There are 72 female judges working in Iraqi courts.
OPINION
July 15, 2010 | By Jack J. Gold
I retired recently as a Los Angeles County Superior Court Commissioner after 26 years on the bench, and I take issue with The Times' June 14 article, "Juvenile justice diverges in court." I was a criminal defense lawyer before becoming a commissioner, and a great part of my practice was representing juveniles in the Juvenile Court. (Many of the county's judges had similar experiences before being elevated to the bench.) As commissioner, I heard thousands of juvenile cases over the years involving countless different offenses, including murder, rape and robbery.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
June 14, 2010 | By Molly Hennessy-Fiske, Los Angeles Times
Travell Lincome was a 15-year-old special education student when he was charged two years ago with assault with a deadly weapon. He and a 16-year-old friend had allegedly thrown bleach at a woman and her baby at a South Los Angeles car wash. His friend, who faced similar charges, got a public defender. To avoid a conflict of interest, Travell was assigned to one of the private lawyers Los Angeles County contracts with for such cases. In the county's juvenile justice system, defendants who cannot afford to hire a private attorney face two distinct — and critics argue unequal — paths.