Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsLeaks
IN THE NEWS

Leaks

NEWS
June 7, 2012 | By Morgan Little, This post has been updated, as indicated below.
WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan group of congressional members called for an investigation into the source of security leaks that led to stories published by the New York Times, but stopped short of claiming the leaks were made for political purposes by the Obama administration. The four lawmakers, Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), along with Reps.  Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.), held a news conference Thursday following a closed-door meeting with National Security Director James Clapper.
Advertisement
BUSINESS
December 19, 2012 | By Salvador Rodriguez
A Russian technology website has leaked the features and specifications for what it says is the rumored Sony smartphone with a 5-inch screen. The site Mobile-review.com  on Wednesday posted a long article describing the phone along with dozens of photographs of the device. The phone, which is expected to be called the Yuga, will have a full HD 1,920-by- 1,080-pixel resolution. It'll also have a 440 pixels-an-inch density that is comparable to that of the HTC Droid DNA, another 5-inch smartphone, according to Engadget , which reported the phone's details in English.
NEWS
June 20, 2012 | By Ken Dilanian
WASHINGTON - As part of his effort to plug leaks, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is considering a proposal to force intelligence agency employees to answer a direct question in their polygraph examinations about whether they have disclosed information to reporters, according to officials familiar with the matter. Government officials who seek top-secret clearances are subject to an initial polygraph test and periodic renewals, in many cases every five years. Currently, they are asked whether they have ever disclosed classified information to someone not authorized to receive it.  But they are not specifically asked about contacts with the news media.
NATIONAL
July 11, 2012 | By Jamie Goldberg, Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON - Expressing outrage over national security leaks, Republicans on a House Judiciary subcommittee pressed legal experts Wednesday on whether it was possible to prosecute reporters for publishing classified information. The response was a qualified yes. "Under certain circumstances, you can see that if someone acting with impunity and knowledge of the consequences goes ahead and publishes it, that is something that I think would be worthy of prosecution and punishment," said Kenneth Wainstein, a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft who specializes in national security.
OPINION
June 21, 2012 | By Michael Kinsley
Cui bono? That's what Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan asks. "Who benefits" from recent leaks of intelligence information to the media? The answer is obvious, Noonan writes, and therefore so is the source of the leaks: It's the folks in the Obama administration, who want to make their man look steely and steady at the helm of U.S. foreign policy. Noonan charges "high administration sources" with "diarrhetic volubility" that is "a real breakthrough in the history of indiscretion.
SCIENCE
August 1, 2013 | By Tony Barboza
An Ontario, Calif., food processing plant operator has agreed to pay $157,000 in fines in connection with a release of toxic ammonia, the Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday. Ventura Foods was cited for failing to immediately notify authorities after its equipment leaked anhydrous ammonia, a poisonous gas, and for deficiencies in its accident prevention and emergency response plans. EPA investigators logged more than two dozen anhydrous ammonia releases at the facility since 2007, including a September 2010 leak into the air and sewer line that was large enough that the company should have reported it immediately under federal environmental laws meant to protect the community.
SPORTS
July 18, 2011 | Staff and wire reports
Lance Armstrong's attorneys say illegal government leaks of grand jury information have sullied the cyclist's reputation, and have asked a court to order federal agents to discuss their contacts with the media. In a 20-page notice of alleged violations filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, lawyers for the seven-time Tour de France winner cited more than a dozen articles in many media outlets from May 2010 through last month about an ongoing grand jury investigation into whether Armstrong used performance-enhancing drugs in violation of U.S. law. The cyclist's attorneys argue that only someone in the government could be responsible for the leaks, and a judge should order the government to explain why it should not be held in contempt.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
January 3, 1997
Re "Not All News Leaks Deserve Law's Shield," Commentary, Dec. 30: But of course! Who but lawyer Gerald Uelmen, member of the defense team in O.J. Simpson's criminal trial, is better suited to lecture us about "the extremes of irresponsibility . . . that thwart justice and fair play"? EDWARD C. BRESSLER
OPINION
August 13, 2004
There is a law, as there should be, against revealing the name of a covert CIA agent. It looks as if people in the Bush administration probably broke this law last summer. Annoyed beyond endurance at Joseph C. Wilson IV -- who was sent to find evidence that Saddam Hussein tried to buy uranium and who came back saying there wasn't any -- somebody in the administration told journalists that Wilson's wife had helped him get the job and, by the way, she was an undercover CIA agent.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
March 17, 2000
Missing from "Radioactive Waste Seeps Toward Columbia River" (March 12) was any realistic assessment of the dangers to people or the environment from the leaking radiation. I am deeply concerned about many environmental issues, such as global warming, the depletion of the ozone layer, destruction of the rain forest, etc. However, from what I know about radiation, the Hanford situation wouldn't even be on my top-100 list of environmental worries. In many parts of the world the natural background radiation is from 10 to 100 times larger than the average level.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|