March 27, 2013 |
It looks like the trustees of the Museum of Contemporary Art have put their money where their mouths are. They have been talking about an ambitious plan to quadruple the roughly $23 million endowment to $100 million, and on Tuesday, they put out an announcement that they had obtained commitments in the last two weeks for enough money to get them to $60 million. That's a great start, and a quick one too. The Times' editorial board recently said we'd like to see MOCA remain independent if that's financially possible.
October 27, 2013
Re "Secretive groups fined a state record $16 million," Oct. 25 There they go again. Secretive political groups cite the U.S. Constitution to defend their shadowy solicitation of massive sums from anonymous, megabucks donors to fund campaign propaganda. The 1st Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression, like the 2nd Amendment's right to bear arms, should be considered in light of late 18th century life. At the time, no one imagined modern assault weapons. Similarly, the modes of mass communication in the 1700s were town criers and primitive printing presses, and proponents of their messages were easily determined.
January 1, 2012
One of the most fascinating displays at the Visitor Center of the Western Currency Facility explains the work of the 19 examiners of the bureau's Mutilated Currency Division. They're the people who piece together damaged money for people who want their bucks back. One of them was a farmer from Iowa. "A cow came up and ate the wallet out of his back pocket," said Charlene Williams, the facility's director. "He had plenty of filet mignon and beef from the cow, because he killed the cow, took the stomach, boxed it up and sent it in. " In another case, a dying man from Texas confessed to his wife that he'd been stashing money for their retirement behind the furnace.
September 24, 2010
'Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps' MPAA rating: PG-13 for brief strong language and thematic elements Running time: 2 hours, 7 minutes Playing: In general release
July 11, 2013 |
As if the consequences of the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling weren't already clear, four graphs released Wednesday provide a compelling visual to stand beside the piles of mounting evidence. See here: Non-Party Independent Expenditures in House and Senate Elections, 1978-2012 For candidates in both parties, the trend line was ticking up years before the court ruled in Citizens United that the government had no role in limiting the political speech of corporations.
November 7, 2010
Whether they touted Meg Whitman or the legalization of marijuana, urged raising taxes for parks or scuttling (or preserving) the climate change law, it seemed as though all of this year's political campaigns promised they were good for California's economy. In a way, it was true. The campaigns and their allied forces poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the state. Sure, most of it went for advertising and consultants, but think trickle-down economics: Mountains of pizza were bought for those late-night strategy meetings.
December 25, 2012
Re "Pressure mounts on U.S. to curtail aid to Rwanda," Dec. 21 This article casually mentions the killing of about 5 million people in Congo, many of them by rebels assisted by Rwanda, which receives U.S. aid. I was under the impression that the civilized world (which includes the U.S., although after recent events one wonders) had agreed with the Jews after World War II to adopt the motto "never again. " Now it appears to have changed to, "Well, it's OK as long as they are not white.
November 5, 2012 |
Backers of Proposition 32 have relentlessly promoted the fiction that the measure would stop special-interest money from flooding California political campaigns because it would stop unions and corporations from deducting money from members' and employees' paychecks for political funds. That won't make special-interest money disappear. All that will do is cripple unions' ability to raise money for political purposes, and leave corporations essentially unfettered to spend what they want influencing elections.
July 4, 2012
Re "Who lost Stockton?," Editorial, June 28 The Times gets it mostly correct, stating that running a city "requires skill, experience and a sense of duty. " Its assertion that this "involves the very business-like practice of taking risks with other people's money" is off the mark, however. The comment also applies to state and federal governments. Ever optimists, we assume that the requisite skills and experience are present to address the issues when, in fact, such an expectation is not realistic.