YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsPlaintiffs


March 27, 2014 | By Howard Blume
A groundbreaking, two-month trial challenging teacher job protections in California concluded Thursday with both sides asserting that the interests of students are at stake. The case, Vergara vs. California, seeks to overturn a set of laws that affect how teachers are fired, laid off and granted tenure. The Silicon Valley-based group Students Matter brought the lawsuit on behalf of nine plaintiffs, contending that the regulations hinder the removal of ineffective teachers. The result is a workforce with thousands of "grossly ineffective" teachers, which disproportionately hurts low-income and minority students, attorneys said.
July 17, 2009 | James Oliphant
Frank Ricci -- the named plaintiff in a lawsuit that Republicans have made Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's albatross -- said at her confirmation hearing Thursday that "Americans have the right to go into our federal courts to have their cases judged based on the Constitution and our laws, not on politics or personal feelings." The white firefighter and 19 of his colleagues sued the city of New Haven, Conn.
July 29, 2011 | By Walter Hamilton and Stuart Pfeifer, Los Angeles Times
The subprime litigation nightmare that Bank of America Corp. inherited with its acquisition of Countrywide Financial Corp. was compounded Thursday when 16 investors — including the giant California Public Employees' Retirement System — brought a new lawsuit alleging that Countrywide misled them about the risks it was taking. The suit filed in federal court in Los Angeles is a setback for Bank of America, which has sought to put the subprime morass behind it by striking settlements with a range of securities holders.
May 20, 2004 | Seema Mehta, Times Staff Writer
Caltrans has agreed to pay a $12.5-million settlement to the relatives of six people killed on a dangerous stretch of Interstate 15 when the driver of a motor home fell asleep and crashed into a dirt wall near Barstow, attorneys confirmed Wednesday. Ten family members were heading home to Utah after taking a Valentine's cruise out of Los Angeles in 1998 when the motor home veered off the road in Yermo. Four passengers survived the crash and were among the 27 relatives who sued the state.
January 13, 2010 | By Garrett Therolf
Three plaintiffs who were incarcerated by the Los Angeles County Probation Department as minors filed a class-action complaint in federal court Tuesday alleging a total breakdown in the school at Camp Challenger in Lancaster. The three allege that teachers at the county's largest probation camp routinely missed classes without explanation, punished students who asked for instruction by sending them out of the classroom and, in the case of one plaintiff, awarded a high school diploma despite the fact that the student was illiterate.
August 28, 2009
In a small, spare courtroom in the Amazon region of Ecuador, Chevron Corp., California's largest company and one of the world's largest oil producers, will soon face a day of reckoning. After 16 years of litigation, a case the company inherited in a merger, Aguinda vs. Texaco Inc., is nearing an end. The legal battle that began in the United States in 1993 and resumed in Ecuador in 2003 has pitted the multinational against an unlikely adversary, a coalition of indigenous tribes and communities.
March 5, 2000
I have a different perspective to offer on the Emil Matasareanu lawsuit. First of all, in my opinion neither the Los Angeles Police Department nor the paramedics did anything wrong. Let us assume for the sake of argument that the defendants in this case were found 100% liable by the jury. On what basis would the damages be calculated? Will [plaintiffs' attorney] Stephen Yagman argue that Matasareanu's children were deprived of the loving companionship of their father as well as his ability to provide financial support?
June 28, 2011 | Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. and Theane Evangelis Kapur, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. and Theane Evangelis Kapur, lawyers in the Los Angeles office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, represented Wal-Mart before the Supreme Court in the Dukes case
Critics are apoplectic about the Supreme Court's decision last week to reject a class-action suit brought against Wal-Mart. They claim the ruling, made in a case brought by an employee named Betty Dukes and two others alleging gender discrimination, will make it more difficult to enforce civil rights protections. What's gotten lost in the debate is that all nine justices -- including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a pioneer for women's rights -- agreed that this class action went too far and jeopardized the due-process rights of millions of employees, who would have been powerless to determine their own fate if the court hadn't stepped in to protect their rights.
Los Angeles Times Articles