Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsPolitical Donations
IN THE NEWS

Political Donations

NEWS
November 5, 2012 | By Carla Hall
Backers of Proposition 32 have relentlessly promoted the fiction that the measure would stop special-interest money from flooding California political campaigns because it would stop unions and corporations from deducting money from members' and employees' paychecks for political funds. That won't make special-interest money disappear. All that will do is cripple unions' ability to raise money for political purposes, and leave corporations essentially unfettered to spend what they want influencing elections.
Advertisement
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
February 13, 2001
Two Feb. 11 articles, "Bush's Ties to Enron Chief Attract Growing Scrutiny" and "Drug Kingpin's Release Adds to Clemency Uproar," are further evidence of our broken democracy. We need to get big money out of politics. Does anyone believe that Bill Clinton's clemency decision was not affected by political donations? President Bush received over $500,000 from Enron's chief plus flew on Enron jets. Bush turns a deaf ear to California's energy woes but lobbied Pennsylvania Gov. Thomas J. Ridge [in 1997]
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
January 10, 2014 | By Patrick McGreevy
SACRAMENTO -- USC politics professor and former Republican strategist Dan Schnur announced Friday that he will run for California secretary of state on a platform of proposals that includes banning lawmakers from campaign fund-raising while the Legislature is in session. A former spokesman to Republicans including  Gov. Pete Wilson and 2000 presidential candidate John McCain, Schnur dropped his Republican Party affiliation in 2011 and plans to run as a "no party preference" candidate.
NEWS
February 7, 2012 | By Kathleen Hennessey
The Obama campaign is returning more than $200,000 in campaign donations from relatives of a fugitive and casino baron believed to be tied to political corruption in Mexico. The decision to return the money came after the contributions were flagged by the New York Times. The newspaper reported late Monday that the money was donated by family members of Juan Jose Rojas "Pepe" Cardona, who is believed to have fled to Mexico after facing drug and fraud charges in the United States. Cardona's brothers, Carlos Cardona and Alberto Rojas, both of Chicago, began donating money to and soliciting contributions for the Obama campaign last fall.
OPINION
July 26, 2012
Re "Free speech and fried chicken," Editorial, July 24 I don't agree with Chick-fil-A's anti-gay political donations, but if you disagree with a company's stance, you can choose not to purchase its product or invest money in it. To think that Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino wants to deny Chick-fil-A a business license simply because it exercised its free-speech rights is offensive. That he would use his power to stifle that speech is the epitome of discrimination, especially because there has been no indication that Chick-fil-A has ever refused service because of sexual orientation.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
December 6, 1998
Re "Supervisors Approve Newhall Ranch Project," Nov. 25. I am writing to praise your coverage of the Newhall Ranch project, especially this article in which the political donations from Newhall Land & Farming Co. contributed to each of the five Los Angeles County supervisors were listed: Mike Antonovich, $69,825; Yvonne Braithwaite Burke, $33,150; Don Knabe, $2,759; Gloria Molina, $12,300, and Zev Yaroslavsky, $18,000. This is crucial information for the public to know. As we are able to follow the money, we the voters will be able to understand the driving forces behind urban sprawl and vote accordingly.
OPINION
April 11, 2014
Re "Big spenders," Letters, April 8 One letter writer asserts that exposing the Koch brothers' financial involvement in various conservative causes is mudslinging. He claims their political spending is no different than that of major Democratic donors such as George Soros and unions. What the writer fails to acknowledge is that the Kochs fund a web of foundations and organizations created by and for themselves to promote their own views. Their political groups are given populist-sounding names - such as Americans for Prosperity - that distract from their real purpose, which is to protect the Kochs' extraordinary personal fortune.
NEWS
April 12, 1989 | KARL SCHOENBERGER, Times Staff Writer
Saying he was "keenly aware" of his "political and moral responsibility," Japanese Prime Minister Noboru Takeshita acknowledged before Parliament on Tuesday that he received nearly $1 million in political donations from the group of companies at the center of a bribery scandal that is shaking his government. Takeshita calmly rejected calls by the opposition that he resign, however, and said he could not run away from his obligation to enact reforms. "For the sake of restoring trust in politics, what is most important is to proceed with political reforms and settle the matter legally and politically as soon as possible," he said.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
June 21, 2013 | By Chris Megerian, Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO -- Ann Ravel, California's top campaign finance watchdog, was nominated to the Federal Election Commission by President Obama on Friday. As chairwoman of the state's Fair Political Practices Commission for the last two years, Ravel has been a consistent critic of the federal government's unwillingness to crack down on secret money in politics. She also received nationwide attention for trying to uncover the donors behind an $11-million contribution that was funneled into California campaigns last year by an Arizona-based nonprofit, Americans for Responsible Leadership.
BUSINESS
November 26, 2013 | By Michael Hiltzik
Way too late to avert scandal, the Internal Revenue Service has set forth new guidelines defining political activities by nonprofits. These are activities for which donations aren't eligible for tax exemptions or donor confidentiality.  What scandal, you ask? It's not the bogus scandal about the IRS targeting "tea party" and "patriot" groups for special scrutiny. It's the real scandal that these groups or any others were trying to get tax breaks and anonymity for political donations in the first place.  Unsurprisingly, conservative groups instantly put up a big squeal about the IRS rules; after all, they're the ones who have exploited the murky old rules most assiduously.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|